Abstract: [Objective] The objectives of this paper were to review and synthesizes the research programs which were conducted in the field of change of forest vegetation and the evolution of soil erosion in Southeast Asia, and to discuss the effectiveness of improved conservation practices on managing soil erosion and sediment yield at catchment scale. [Methods] The forest vegetation change countermeasures at different spatial and temporal scales were analyzed according to data from countries in Southeast Asia. This paper focused on an extensive range of methodologies at different spatial and temporal scales. The research area was the region selected for the implementation of watershed management in Thailand. The efficacy and practicality of passive and active erosion control strategies were expounded. [Results] ① Forest loss in Southeast Asia had remained at high levels during the period from 2000 to 2005, accumulating to an annual deforestation rate of about 2.76×106 ha. However, forest cover has increased in the recent years due to the establishment of forest plantations. ② Southeast Asian haze was a large-scale air pollution problem that occurs regularly. The haze was largely caused by illegal agricultural fires. ③ Soil erosion control strategies for manage soil erosion in Southeast Asia include alley cropping, contouring, strip cropping, grass barriers, conservation tillage, minimum tillage and hedgerow inter-cropping. Despite the role of conservation practices being well established in reducing water runoff at the plot scale, extrapolation to a large scale, it has been less understood and verified. The potential impact of soil conservation on yield may be a key factor that affects the value of soil conservation investments. [Conclusion] The challenge of forest vegetation change in Southeast Asia is real and urgent. Regional prevention and control mechanisms should be constructed to decrease forest fire and haze. To decrease soil erosion, we should keep a sustainable forestry and sustain terrestrial biodiversity. Selection of appropriate soil conservation methods for low income smallholder farmers is critical to reduce the rate of soil erosion as well as to increase crop productivity.
Keywords: forest vegetation; soil erosion and conservation; haze pollution; Southeast Asia
收稿日期:2018-11-12修回日期:2019-02-26
第一作者:Chinapatana Sukvibool(1956—),男,泰國人,主要從事水土保持管理工作,E-mail:sukvibool@hotmail.com。
專家論壇
泰國土地發(fā)展部顧問Chinapatana Sukvibool先生論東南亞森林植被變化與土壤侵蝕管理
摘 要:[目的] 回顧和總結(jié)近年來東南亞地區(qū)森林植被變化與水土流失演變領(lǐng)域研究項(xiàng)目的成果,并探討東南亞地區(qū)改良后的保育措施在流域尺度水土流失與產(chǎn)沙管理方面的成效。 [方法] 根據(jù)東南亞各國不同時(shí)空尺度的數(shù)據(jù),分析了該區(qū)森林植被的變化及采取的對(duì)策。選擇泰國實(shí)施流域管理的地區(qū)為研究區(qū),闡述了被動(dòng)和主動(dòng)侵蝕控制策略的有效性和實(shí)用性。 [結(jié)果] ①在2000—2005年期間,東南亞地區(qū)的森林面積大幅減少,累計(jì)年度森林砍伐率達(dá)到2.76×106hm2。然而,由于森林種植園的建立,該區(qū)森林覆蓋率近期已經(jīng)增加。②東南亞霧霾是一種定期發(fā)生的大范圍空氣污染問題,它在很大程度上起因于農(nóng)業(yè)上的非法放火燒荒。③東南亞地區(qū)土壤侵蝕管理措施包括帶狀種植、等高耕作、條狀種植、草障、保護(hù)性耕作、免耕種植和植物籬間作。盡管在小區(qū)尺度上,保護(hù)措施在減少徑流方面發(fā)揮了良好的作用,但對(duì)大尺度而言,其作用還有待進(jìn)一步的研究和驗(yàn)證。 水土保持對(duì)產(chǎn)量的潛在影響可能是影響水土保持投資價(jià)值的一個(gè)關(guān)鍵因素。[結(jié)論] 東南亞地區(qū)森林覆蓋變化的挑戰(zhàn)既真實(shí)又迫切。我們應(yīng)該建立區(qū)域防控機(jī)制減少森林火災(zāi)和霧霾,并通過保持一個(gè)可持續(xù)的林業(yè),維護(hù)陸地生物多樣性減少土壤侵蝕。為低收入小戶型農(nóng)民選擇適當(dāng)?shù)乃帘3址椒ǎ瑢?duì)于降低水土流失速度和提高作物產(chǎn)量至關(guān)重要。
關(guān)鍵詞:森林植被; 土壤侵蝕與保持; 霧霾污染; 東南亞
文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼:C文章編號(hào):1000-288X(2019)03-0307-06
中圖分類號(hào):S157, X171.4
文獻(xiàn)參數(shù):Chinapatana Sukvibool.東南亞森林植被變化與土壤侵蝕管理[J].水土保持通報(bào),2019,39(3):307-312.DOI:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.03.049; Chinapatana Sukvibool. Change of forest vegetation and management of soil erosion in Southeast Asia[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,39(3):307-312.
The forests of Southeast Asia comprise some of the world’s most valuable and productive tropical forests, forming unique ecosystems of high biodiversity composition. But forest loss in Southeast Asia has remained at high levels during the period from 2000 to 2005. The continuing loss of forests in Southeast Asia is alarming not only in terms of the sustainable development of the forest resources, but also for biodiversity conservation. The economic loss suffered by countries during the haze episode was enormous. Several economic sectors, including air, water and land transport, tourism and agriculture have been severely affected.
The Southeast Asia includes 11 countries, they are Cambodia, Indonesia, Brunei, Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam, Laos, Thailand, Myanmar and East Timor. The Southeast Asia is divided into two parts: the islands and the mainland. The mainland is a peninsula, and the islands extend east and west between the Indian Ocean and Pacific Ocean.
The west coast of Myanmar is a tropical humid climate, the mainland is a tropical dry and humid climate, and the southeast coast of India is a tropical humid climate covered with tropical rainforest. The summer monsoon brings a lot of rain to the area, and the rainfall reaches at least 1 524 mm per year. Southeast Asia contains the second largest tropical rain forest region in the world. Rain forests are a source of lumber, herbs, medicines, and chemicals. Rain forests once covered nearly all of Southeast Asia. But huge sections have been cut down over the years.
About 60% of the Southeast Asian population work in agricultural sector. People farm and live in the river valleys of the mountain. Crops include cash crops such as: oil palm, coffee, tea, and rubber. Rubber and oil palm products are the major exporters in Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. Soybeans, sugar cane, fruit and rice are also major agricultural products. Rice is a food crop as well as a cash crop. Indonesia, Vietnam and Thailand are the top rice-producing nations.
Southeast Asian haze is a fire-related large-scale air pollution problem that occurs regularly. These haze events have caused adverse health and economic impact on Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and to a less degree, the Philippines and Thailand. The problem flares up every dry season in varying degrees. Trans-boundary haze in Southeast Asia has been recorded since 1972. The haze is largely caused by illegal agricultural fires due to industrial-scale slash-and-burn practices in Indonesia, especially from the provinces of South Sumatra and Riau in Indonesia’s Sumatra Island, and Kalimantan on Indonesian Borneo. The burned land can be sold at a higher price illegally, and eventually used for activities including oil palm and pulpwood production. Burning is also cheaper and faster compared to cutting and clearing using excavators or other machines.
Forest cover and its annual change rate vary widely, typically as a function of country size. Forest cover of most countries in Southeast Asia is at least 50%, but forest cover in East Timor, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam ranges from 20% to 30%; especially in Singapore, forest cover is less than 3%.
The total annual reduction of forest cover is greatest in Indonesia and Myanmar. In fact, new evidence from Indonesia indicates an annual loss of 1.80×106ha per year (Indonesia FLB, 2001) and it is estimated that annual loss of forest cover increases at 5.00×105ha over at present. The only country with a positive forest cover change is Vietnam. There is no change of the forest cover in Brunei Darussalam and Singapore. Forest loss in Southeast Asia has remained at high levels during the period from 2000 to 2005, accumulating to an annual deforestation rate of about 2.76×106ha or occupying 1.3% of the region’s forest area. In Indonesia alone, the moist tropical forests experienced an annual loss of almost 1.90×106ha, which accounted for about 2% of the region’s forest area. High forest loss is also reported in Myanmar and Cambodia, with annual deforestation rates of 4.66×105ha (occupying 1.5% of the region’s forest area) and 2.19×105ha (accounting for 2% of the region’s forest area), respectively. For the whole region, the annual net loss remained at the same level as reported for the 1990s, with annual deforestation rates of 2.79×106ha.
Unsustainable cutting and burning of forests, along with diseases and insects are the crux reasons for forest vegetation change. Tropical deforestation is a potentially catastrophic issue for the change of forest vegetation. Moreover, the high rate of tropical deforestation might increasingly contribute to global warming.
The solution for sustainability of tropical forests in Southeast Asia involves two aspects: prevention methods and rehabilitation methods.
Methods to prevent forests from deforestation are as follows: ① To protect the most diverse and endangered areas; ② To educate settlers about sustainable agriculture and forestry; ③ To subsidize only sustainable forest use; ④ To protect forests with debt-for-nature swaps and conservation concessions; ⑤ To certify sustainably grown timber; ⑥ To reduce poverty; ⑦ To slow population growth down.
Methods to restore forests are as follows: ① To encourage regrowth through secondary succession; ② To rehabilitate degraded areas; ③ To concentrate farming and ranching in already-cleared areas.
Soil erosion was very serious in Southeast Asia due to the high rate of tropical deforestation during 2000—2005. To control soil erosion, researchers have evaluated the efficacy and practicality of passive and active erosion control strategies. These include alley cropping, contouring, strip cropping, grass barriers, conservation tillage, minimum tillage and hedgerow inter-cropping. Selection of appropriate soil conservation measures for low income smallholder farmers is critical to reduce the rate of soil erosion as well as to increase crop productivity. The potential impact of soil conservation on yield may be a key factor that affects the value of soil conservation investments. Soil conservation strategy adoption by upland farmers is not a function of the farming system type or income. Despite the role of conservation practices being well established in reducing water runoff at the plot scale, extrapolation to a large scale, it has been less understood and verified.
The loss of nutrients in the upper layer of soil reduces the ability of soil to retain water after erosion, resulting in decline of soil quality. Fertilizing can increase the nutrient content of soil. But it is not an option in most developing countries. The main off-site effect of water erosion is the movement of sediment and agricultural pollutants into watercourses. Sediment in watercourses can lead to the silting-up of dams, disruption of the ecosystems of lakes, and contamination of drinking water. Increased downstream flooding may also occur due to the reduced capacity of eroded soil to absorb water, and the reduced capacity of streams and lakes to hold water.
The research area is the region selected for the implementation of watershed management in Thailand case. The implemented varieties of soil and water conservation measures are shown in Fig.1. Several engineering measures were adopted to prevent and control the damages caused by soil erosion in the river basin. In addition, vetiver grass is used as an effective biological measure. It is a kind of living barrier for soil erosion control (Fig. 2).
Fig.1 Engineering measures for watershed management, Thailand
Fig.2 Ecological restoration function of vetiver grass, Thailand
The solutions to problems of soil erosion in Southeast Asia are sustainable forestry and terrestrial biodiversity. The major tree harvesting methods are selective cutting, clear-cutting and strip cutting.
We should identify and protect forest areas with high biodiversity, rely more on selective cutting and strip cutting, no clear-cutting on steep slopes, no logging of old-growth forests, reduce road building into uncut forest areas, leave most standing dead trees and fallen timber for wildlife habitat and nutrient recycling, certify timber grown by sustainable methods including ecological services of forests in estimating their economic value.
We should adopt forests, plant trees and take care of them, recycle paper and buy recycled paper products, buy sustainably produced wood and wood products, choose wood substitutes as bamboo furniture and recycled plastic outdoor furniture, decking, and fencing, help to restore a nearby degraded forest or grassland, and landscape our yard with a diversity of natural plants.
ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) has signed agreement on trans-boundary haze pollution. The agreement aims to prevent and monitor trans-boundary haze pollution as a result of land and forest fires which should be mitigated, through concerted national efforts and intensified regional and international co-operation. The development of the ASEAN agreement on trans-boundary haze pollution was as follows: ① Since the early 1990s, ASEAN member states have been working together to tackle trans-boundary haze pollution problem arising from land and forest fires. ② In 1995, ASEAN Environment Ministers agreed to intensify co-operation through concrete programs spelt out in the regional haze action plan (RHAP) to prevent, monitor and mitigate land and forest fires. ③ The RHAP was adopted at the first ASEAN ministerial meeting on haze in December 1997 in Singapore. ④ In 1999, ASEAN took a further step by adopting the policy on zero-burning and banning of open burning as a long-term strategy during dry season. ⑤ The ASEAN Haze Agreement was signed by the ten ASEAN members states on 10 June 2002 during the occasion of the World Conference and Exhibition on Land and Forest Fire Hazards in Kuala Lumpur. ⑥ The agreement entered into force on 25 November 2003, following the deposit of the sixth instrument of ratification by Thailand on 26 September 2003.
Information on forest cover in Cambodia is of high quality and up to date. It appears that the rate of loss of forest cover has slowed from a rather high rate during the 1980s. Forest degradation, however, remains a serious problem.
There is uncertainty about the data for Indonesia. Data published since these estimates were made suggest a higher rate of forest cover loss. There are some questions and concerns on how the new data were derived, but the situation in Indonesia remains serious.
Data from Lao People’s Democratic Republic are probably quite reliable. The most recent data are from 1989. National data suggest that forest degradation is serious.
Malaysia has separate data for Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak. Secondary figures had to be relied on and periods between surveys were quite long (10 years for Peninsular Malaysia, 25 years for Sabah and 20 years for Sarawak). The secondary data are probably reliable. However, extrapolation over such long periods may have caused the overestimation of forest cover loss.
Data from Myanmar are up to date and probably reliable. It shows that Myanmar has a high annual loss of forest cover. Forest degradation is also serious.
Data sets for the Philippines are rather recent and compatible, and its reliability can be regarded as high. Loss of forest cover is high for the sub-region, which is 1.4% per year. Some innovative management initiatives to arrest this development are under way.
No major change in forest cover for Singapore should be expected. The “greening” policy and urban forest management programs are interesting examples for other large cities.
The period between the data sets of Thailand is long (17 years), but it is unlikely that this has led to overestimation of annual forest cover loss. Interesting rehabilitation and reforestation initiatives are also under implementing.
Vietnam is the only country in the sub-region with an annual increase of forest cover. Data are secondary but of rather recent date. Establishment of plantations helps offset annual loss of natural forest cover in the range of 3.00 ×104ha.
The sub-region may cease to be a major exporter of large logs from natural forests, since accessible natural forests have mostly been depleted. The region has also undergone rapid economic development and there is a growing domestic demand for forest products. Forest industry has expanded during the last several decades and now mainly includes pulp and paper mills.
The challenge of forest vegetation change in Southeast Asia is real and urgent. The forest vegetation change is likely to amplify the environmental stresses and vulnerabilities of some of the existing urban and its urban communities, many of which are living in coastal and low-lying areas and rapid expanding mega-cities. A business-as-usual scenario is unlikely to support a sustainable Southeast Asia. Based on this situation, Southeast Asian responses to date have been largely inadequate even though several important steps have been taken and a number of essential foundations, both at country and regional levels, have been established for further action. For example, ASEAN leaders have recently signed the Declaration of Environmental Sustainability and the ASEAN cooperation in environment has established a common agenda and forged consensus on some policy goals for sustainable development as well as action to address trans-boundary haze pollution, nature conservation and biodiversity, marine and coastal environment problems.
Common issues of concerns include illegal logging, forest fires and encroachment. Stakeholders, participation, alternative ownership systems, resolution of land use conflicts and rehabilitation of degraded forests have started to play more important roles in forest management.
Forestry plantation is being practiced on an increasingly large scale to relieve the pressure on natural forests. Large plantations exist in the sub-region and many countries have major afforestation programs. It will, however, take some time for plantations to replace natural forests as a source of raw material. In the meantime, appropriate use and management of natural forests will be crucial. Natural forests in the sub-region are state-owned. There is no longer an abundance of heavily stocked natural forests to rely on.