?謝偉山 伍運(yùn)輝 吳向前 駱強(qiáng)

【摘要】 目的：探討嚴(yán)重的多發(fā)傷造成失血性休克患者應(yīng)用限制液體復(fù)蘇治療效果情況。方法：選取2017年12月-2018年12月筆者所在醫(yī)院診治的100例嚴(yán)重的多發(fā)傷并失血性休克患者，隨機(jī)分兩組，對(duì)照組予常規(guī)積極液體相關(guān)復(fù)蘇治療，研究組予限制液體復(fù)蘇治療方案，分析兩組復(fù)蘇指標(biāo)及GCS指標(biāo)、凝血指標(biāo)及并發(fā)癥情況。結(jié)果：治療后，研究組液體輸入（1620.54±651.23）ml，術(shù)前復(fù)蘇時(shí)間（62.23±10.46）min，均比對(duì)照組少，GCS評(píng)分（9.81±1.06）分，比對(duì)照組高，差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P<0.05）;研究組PT（13.06±1.23）s、APTT（21.23±1.46）s及TT（12.13±1.26）s，均比對(duì)照組低，差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P<0.05）;研究組發(fā)生呼吸衰竭、炎癥反應(yīng)等并發(fā)癥均比對(duì)照組少，比較差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P<0.05）。結(jié)論：嚴(yán)重的多發(fā)傷并失血性休克患者應(yīng)用限制性相關(guān)液體復(fù)蘇治療，能改善患者復(fù)蘇指標(biāo)及GCS評(píng)分，改善凝血指標(biāo)，并減少并發(fā)癥發(fā)生。

【關(guān)鍵詞】 嚴(yán)重多發(fā)傷; 失血性休克; 限制液體復(fù)蘇; 凝血指標(biāo); 復(fù)蘇指標(biāo)

doi：10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2019.12.014 文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼 B 文章編號(hào) 1674-6805（2019）12-00-03

The Role of Restrictive Fluid Resuscitation in Severe Hemorrhagic Shock Caused by Hemorrhagic Shock/XIE Weishan，WU Yunhui，WU Xiangqian，et al.//Chinese and Foreign Medical Research，2019，17（12）：-34

【Abstract】 Objective：To explore the role of restrictive fluid resuscitation in severe hemorrhagic shock caused by hemorrhagic shock.Method：100 patients with severe multiple trauma and hemorrhagic shock were diagnosed and treated in our hospital from December 2017 to December 2018，which were randomly divided into two groups.The control group received routine active fluid-related resuscitation，and the study group restricted fluid resuscitation.Then analyzed the recovery indicators and GCS indicators，coagulation indicators and complications of two groups.Result：After treatment，the fluid input （1 620.54±651.23）ml and preoperative resuscitation （62.23±10.46）min in the study group were lower than those in the control group，and the GCS （9.81±1.06）points was higher than that of the control group（P<0.05）.The PT （13.06±1.23）s，APTT （21.23±1.46）s and TT （12.13±1.26）s in the study group were lower than those in the control group，and the difference was statistically significant（P<0.05）.The operative complications，respiratory failure and inflammatory reaction in the study group were less than those in the control group，and the difference was statistically significant（P<0.05）.Conclusion：The patients with severe multiple trauma and hemorrhagic shock treated with restrictive fluid resuscitation could improve the recovery index and GCS index，reduce the coagulation index，and has fewer complications.

【Key words】 Severe multiple injuries; Hemorrhagic shock; Limited fluid resuscitation; Coagulation index; Recovery index

First-authors address：Houjie Hospital of Dongguan City，Dongguan 523000，China

多發(fā)傷主要指同致傷因素下造成機(jī)體出血超過一個(gè)部位嚴(yán)重創(chuàng)傷，并且多發(fā)傷患者機(jī)體臟器、組織損傷比較嚴(yán)重，會(huì)造成大量失血，進(jìn)而出現(xiàn)失血性休克，嚴(yán)重影響患者正常生活質(zhì)量[1-2]。臨床通常采用液體復(fù)蘇治療方案，以維持機(jī)體生命體征穩(wěn)定，恢復(fù)血壓及器官灌注，降低失血造成的負(fù)面影響[3-4]。為提高患者急救效果，本研究對(duì)2017年12月-2018年12月筆者所在醫(yī)院診治的50例嚴(yán)重的多發(fā)傷并失血性休克患者應(yīng)用限制液體復(fù)蘇治療效果進(jìn)行分析，具體報(bào)告如下。