劉加平 WA技術(shù)進(jìn)步獎(jiǎng)評(píng)委中國(guó)工程院院士西安建筑科技大學(xué)綠色建筑研究中心主任、教授

LIU Jiaping Jury member of WA Technological Innovation Award Academician,Chinese Academy of Engineering Director,Professor,Institute of Green Building,Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology

WA 技術(shù)進(jìn)步獎(jiǎng)評(píng)審中的技術(shù)進(jìn)步，我以為既包括申報(bào)作品中如何將建筑新理念、新產(chǎn)品和新技術(shù)融入建筑創(chuàng)作之中，又包括作品建成后各種技術(shù)性能指標(biāo)的提升和進(jìn)步，還包括建筑創(chuàng)作與設(shè)計(jì)方法的進(jìn)步，最終表達(dá)為整體上是一棟好建筑。本次申報(bào)的所有作品，主創(chuàng)建筑師在以上幾個(gè)方面都有所考慮，評(píng)出的獲獎(jiǎng)作品，較好地綜合體現(xiàn)了技術(shù)進(jìn)步的方方面面。中國(guó)社會(huì)已進(jìn)入綠色發(fā)展新時(shí)代，綠色低碳建筑成為新的“時(shí)尚”和潮流，一線建筑師給予了積極響應(yīng)，巧妙融合節(jié)能低碳新技術(shù)的新建筑如雨后春筍般地涌現(xiàn)。祝賀獲獎(jiǎng)建筑師。

The technological innovation in the review of WA Technological Innovation Award is,in my opinion,not only about how new architectural concepts,products and technologies can be integrated into the architectural design,but also about the improvement and progress of various technical performance indicators after the completion of the building;moreover,it includes advances in architectural creation and design methods,which are ultimately translated into a good building as a whole.For almost all the entries,the chief architects have considered the above aspects,while the prize-winning works reflect the various aspects of technological progress in a comprehensive way.China has entered a new era of green development,and green and low-carbon architecture has become a new "fashion" and trend.Front-line architects have responded positively,whilst new buildings with skilful energy-saving and low-carbon technologies are springing up like mushrooms after the rain.Congratulations to the award-winning architects!.(Translated by Dandan Wang)

馮正功WA技術(shù)進(jìn)步獎(jiǎng)評(píng)委全國(guó)工程勘察設(shè)計(jì)大師中衡設(shè)計(jì)集團(tuán)股份有限公司董事長(zhǎng)兼首席總建筑師

FENG Zhenggong Jury member of WA Technological Innovation Award National Engineering Survey and Design Master President and Principal Architect,ARTS Group Co.,Ltd.

有幸參加WA 技術(shù)進(jìn)步獎(jiǎng)的評(píng)審，從送評(píng)的作品及獲獎(jiǎng)項(xiàng)目來(lái)看，總體代表了我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段建筑技術(shù)的關(guān)注方向及發(fā)展水平。從首鋼園區(qū)煉鐵工藝核心區(qū)（三高爐+冬奧廣場(chǎng)+星巴克）獲優(yōu)勝獎(jiǎng)可以看出，建筑遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)與再利用技術(shù)受到評(píng)委的一致肯定?？v觀建筑幾千年的發(fā)展歷程，既是一部建筑藝術(shù)史，同時(shí)也是一部建筑技術(shù)進(jìn)步史，兩者如同前進(jìn)的兩條腿，具有舉足輕重的地位，缺一不可。建筑具有藝術(shù)品與技術(shù)產(chǎn)品的雙重屬性，建筑技術(shù)涵蓋了多學(xué)科跨專(zhuān)業(yè)范疇，技術(shù)的提升與極限的應(yīng)用往往正是建筑藝術(shù)創(chuàng)新的體現(xiàn)。

It is my honour to participate in the selection of the WA Technological Innovation Award.The entries and the award-winning projects generally represent the direction and development level of the architectural technology at the current stage in China.The winner project,the Iron-making Core Area of Shougang Park (Shougang No.3 Blast Furnace Museum+Winter Olympics Plaza+Starbucks),shows that protection and reuse techniques of architectural heritage were unanimously approved by the jury.Throughout the development of architecture over thousand s of years,it is not only a history of the art of architecture,but also a history of technological progress in architecture.Both,like the two legs of a walking body,have a crucial position -neither of them is dispensable.Architecture has both the attributes of artworks and technological products.While the architectural technology covers a wide range of multi-disciplines and inter-disciplines,the improvement of technology and the application of limits are often the innovative expression of the architectural art.(Translated by Dandan Wang)

郭建祥WA技術(shù)進(jìn)步獎(jiǎng)評(píng)委全國(guó)工程勘察設(shè)計(jì)大師華東建筑設(shè)計(jì)研究院有限公司副總經(jīng)理、首席總建筑師

GUO Jianxiang Jury member of WA Technological Innovation Award National Engineering Survey and Design Master Deputy General Manager,Principal Chief Architect,East China Architectural Design and Research Institute Co.,Ltd

很榮幸能夠參加本屆WA 技術(shù)進(jìn)步獎(jiǎng)的評(píng)選。建筑學(xué)自其誕生開(kāi)始即包含了其技術(shù)性與藝術(shù)性的“協(xié)調(diào)性”與“統(tǒng)一性”。技術(shù)進(jìn)步一直是建筑學(xué)不斷發(fā)展的源動(dòng)力。技術(shù)的發(fā)展能夠折射時(shí)代的變遷。在建筑設(shè)計(jì)由增量發(fā)展轉(zhuǎn)入存量更新的今天，建筑師更要關(guān)注多學(xué)科之間的跨界與融入，關(guān)注在技術(shù)不斷發(fā)展下城市空間形態(tài)的變化，在實(shí)踐中尋求一種建筑技術(shù)營(yíng)造與建筑藝術(shù)表現(xiàn)之間的適配性，將結(jié)構(gòu)、綠色、智慧等諸多方面構(gòu)建為統(tǒng)一建筑學(xué)語(yǔ)境下的技術(shù)體系，實(shí)現(xiàn)創(chuàng)意—技術(shù)—空間之間的和諧統(tǒng)一。

It is my great honour to participate in the review of this year's WA Technological Innovation Award.Since its birth,architecture has included both "harmony" and "unity" of technology and art.Technological progress has always been the driving force for the continuous development of architecture.Furthermore,the development of technology can reflect the changes of the times.Today,architectural design changes from incremental development into inventory renewal.Architects should pay more attention to the crossover and integration of multi-disciplines,focus on the changes of urban spatial form under the continuous development of technology,and seek a kind of suitability between the creation of architectural technology and architectural artistic expression in practice.Additionally,they should integrate the different disciplines,including structure,environmental protection and intelligence,into a technological system under a unified architectural context,reaching the harmony and unity between creativity,technology and space.(Translated by Dandan Wang)

林波榮WA技術(shù)進(jìn)步獎(jiǎng)評(píng)委清華大學(xué)建筑學(xué)院副院長(zhǎng)、教授

LIN Borong Jury member of WA Technological Innovation Award Vice Dean,Professor,School of Architecture,Tsinghua University

本屆WA 中國(guó)建筑獎(jiǎng)技術(shù)進(jìn)步獎(jiǎng)評(píng)審，充分體現(xiàn)了技術(shù)與建筑設(shè)計(jì)的融合創(chuàng)新，是建筑設(shè)計(jì)引領(lǐng)下的技術(shù)創(chuàng)新，特別是材料、科技與空間、平面、形體的新美學(xué)融為一體，令人印象深刻，為之點(diǎn)贊。這樣的項(xiàng)目，既有服務(wù)于北京2022 冬奧會(huì)的首鋼改造項(xiàng)目，也有像亞投行總部大樓這樣的國(guó)際高品質(zhì)頂級(jí)辦公建筑，還有獲得過(guò)全國(guó)綠色建筑創(chuàng)新獎(jiǎng)一等獎(jiǎng)的博覽會(huì)等公共建筑。此外，像扎根西藏、與自然一體化的酒店建筑，與自然景觀融合一體的展覽建筑，亦卓然不群，有別樣的新穎，充分體現(xiàn)了中國(guó)建筑師在新時(shí)代的技術(shù)創(chuàng)新和創(chuàng)作自信。

The WA Technological Innovation Award fully reflected the integrated innovation of technology and architectural design.It is the technological innovation led by architectural design,especially the integration of materials,technology and the new aesthetics of space,plane and form -impressive and praiseworthy.These projects include the Shougang Renovation for the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics,high-quality international office buildings like the Asia Financial Centre and AIIB Headquarters,and public buildings such as the Expo buildings which won the first prize of the National Green Building Innovation Award.In addition,works such as the hotel building rooted in Tibet and integrated with nature,and the exhibition buildings that integrate with the natural landscape,are also outstanding and innovative,fully reflecting the technological innovation and creative confidence of Chinese architects in the new era.(Translated by Dandan Wang)

孫澄WA技術(shù)進(jìn)步獎(jiǎng)評(píng)委哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)建筑學(xué)院院長(zhǎng)、深圳國(guó)際設(shè)計(jì)學(xué)院院長(zhǎng)、教授

SUN Cheng Jury member of WA Technological Innovation Award Professor,Dean of School of Architecture,Dean of International School of Design in Shenzhen,Harbin Institute of Technology

本屆WA 中國(guó)建筑獎(jiǎng)技術(shù)進(jìn)步獎(jiǎng)的參評(píng)作品充分展現(xiàn)了我國(guó)建筑產(chǎn)業(yè)取得的長(zhǎng)足發(fā)展和進(jìn)步，體現(xiàn)了信息化轉(zhuǎn)型和工業(yè)化升級(jí)為建筑產(chǎn)業(yè)賦予的新動(dòng)能。這次評(píng)審過(guò)程對(duì)我來(lái)說(shuō)也是一次學(xué)習(xí)的過(guò)程，在評(píng)審中既能感受到“碳達(dá)峰”與“碳中和”國(guó)家戰(zhàn)略推動(dòng)下的建筑創(chuàng)作理論方法創(chuàng)新，又能體會(huì)到人工智能時(shí)代語(yǔ)境下的建筑創(chuàng)作技術(shù)與平臺(tái)革新；更難能可貴的是作品中呈現(xiàn)出的面向世界科技前沿、面向經(jīng)濟(jì)主戰(zhàn)場(chǎng)、面向國(guó)家重大需求和面向人民生命健康的建筑創(chuàng)作價(jià)值導(dǎo)向。

The entries of this year's WA Technological Innovation Award fully demonstrate the great development and progress of China's architecture industry,and reflect the new momentum given to the industry by the information-based transformation and upgrading of industrialisation.The review process was another learning experience for me.During the review,not only did I find the theoretical and methodological innovation of the architectural creation promoted by the national strategy of emission peak and carbon neutrality,but also the innovation of architectural creation technology and platforms in the context of artificial intelligence era.What is more valuable is the value orientation of architectural creation in the work towards the frontiers of science and technology in the world,the main battlefield of the economy,the major needs of the country and people's lives and health.(Translated by Dandan Wang)

鄭時(shí)齡WA城市貢獻(xiàn)獎(jiǎng)評(píng)委中國(guó)科學(xué)院院士同濟(jì)大學(xué)建筑與城市規(guī)劃學(xué)院教授意大利羅馬大學(xué)名譽(yù)博士法國(guó)建筑科學(xué)院院士美國(guó)建筑師學(xué)會(huì)名譽(yù)資深會(huì)員

ZHENG Shiling Jury member of WA City Regeneration Award Member of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Professor,College of Architecture and Urban Planning,Tongji University Laurea Honoris Causa,Università di Roma,La Sapienza Membre de l'Académie d'Architecture de France Honorary Fellow,American Institute of Architects

作為WA 城市貢獻(xiàn)獎(jiǎng)的評(píng)委主席，我對(duì)此次評(píng)審過(guò)程感觸頗深。這一獎(jiǎng)項(xiàng)的參評(píng)數(shù)量、建筑師的踴躍程度、作品的整體水準(zhǔn)都令人印象深刻，其評(píng)判標(biāo)準(zhǔn)也已超越傳統(tǒng)建筑學(xué)的價(jià)值判斷體系。在抉擇、評(píng)審的過(guò)程中，多樣性和代表性是評(píng)委們普遍關(guān)注的，包括既有類(lèi)型、規(guī)模、實(shí)踐形式、建筑師介入方式等方面的多樣性。最終評(píng)委們一致同意的入圍項(xiàng)目，所呈現(xiàn)的正是這樣的特點(diǎn)。一座在傳統(tǒng)建筑學(xué)意義上的好建筑，已不足以應(yīng)對(duì)人們對(duì)所謂“城市貢獻(xiàn)”的考問(wèn)。WA 城市貢獻(xiàn)獎(jiǎng)的獲獎(jiǎng)項(xiàng)目，反映了建筑界對(duì)于城市問(wèn)題的普遍關(guān)注。越來(lái)越多的建筑師關(guān)注自己應(yīng)承擔(dān)的社會(huì)責(zé)任與城市公共責(zé)任，他們更多地視自己的作品為城市的有機(jī)組成部分，力圖使自己的作品在功能、尺度和空間上融入城市，服務(wù)人們高品質(zhì)的社區(qū)生活——這正是我國(guó)建筑界近年來(lái)的核心轉(zhuǎn)變與主要趨勢(shì)之一。

As the chairman of the jury for 2020 WA City Regeneration Award,I was greatly impressed by the process of evaluation.The number of entries,the enthusiasm of the architects and the overall quality of their work were all remarkable.The criteria for evaluation have transcended the value system of traditional architecture.In the process of selection and evaluation,all juries highlight diversity and representativeness,including the diversity of the existing building type,size and practicing form as well as the methodology architects intervene.The final shortlists all jury members approved presented exactly such characteristics.A good building in the conventional sense can no longer satisfy the calling for "contribution to the city" .The WA City Regeneration Award reflects that architectural community now all concern about urban issues.Architects pay more attention to their own social and public responsibilities.They tend to see their work more as an organic part for the city,attempting to integrate it into the city in terms of function,scale and space,in order to further improve the quality of community lives.This is exactly the core transformation and one of the main trends for China's architectural field in recent years.(Translated by Dandan Wang)

馮江WA城市貢獻(xiàn)獎(jiǎng)評(píng)委華南理工大學(xué)建筑學(xué)院教授

FENG Jiang Jury member of WA City Regeneration Award Professor,South China University of Technology

建筑可以為城市做出怎樣的貢獻(xiàn)？WA 城市貢獻(xiàn)獎(jiǎng)的百余個(gè)候選作品從不同角度詮釋了各自的理解。如何評(píng)價(jià)這些無(wú)論從尺度、類(lèi)型、造價(jià)、技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)上差異特別大的作品？絕大部分作品顯示出建筑師總體上擺脫了對(duì)符號(hào)化的地標(biāo)性城市象征物的迷戀，很少出現(xiàn)通過(guò)引經(jīng)據(jù)典追求建筑永恒性的情況，而更加看重建筑在社會(huì)公平、環(huán)境友好、地域適應(yīng)性等維度上對(duì)城市和普通人的實(shí)際作用。候選作品涉及市民中心、學(xué)校、市場(chǎng)、公共廁所、口袋廣場(chǎng)、濱水空間景觀、工業(yè)遺產(chǎn)改造、歷史文化街區(qū)微更新等，建筑師所采取的策略與途徑也頗為不同。我更加認(rèn)同在設(shè)計(jì)中深入思考建筑與城市、基地、生活之間具體而真實(shí)的關(guān)系，在解決實(shí)際問(wèn)題（哪怕是很微小的問(wèn)題）的過(guò)程中樸實(shí)自然地融入城市和市民生活，建筑因此而獲得力量和意義。本次評(píng)審在線上進(jìn)行，評(píng)委之間的討論十分坦誠(chéng)。最終優(yōu)勝獎(jiǎng)授予一座臨時(shí)建筑，雖有引發(fā)爭(zhēng)議和不恰當(dāng)模仿的擔(dān)憂，但建筑師通過(guò)設(shè)計(jì)對(duì)提升城市社區(qū)日常生活品質(zhì)的貢獻(xiàn)最終贏得了認(rèn)同。

How can architecture contribute to a city? More than 100 entries for the WA City Regeneration Award have provided their own answers from different perspectives.How can the contribution of these works,which differ greatly from each other in terms of scale,type,cost and technical standards,be evaluated? The majority of the works demonstrate that architects have generally freed themselves from the obsession with the symbolic landmark of a city,and rarely pursued the permanence of architecture through references to the classics,but paid more attention to the contribution of architecture to the city and its residents from the social fairness,environmental-friendliness and regional adaptability dimensions.The projects involve a variety of types,such as civic centres,schools,markets,public toilets,pocket plazas,waterfront landscapes,industrial heritage renovations,historic district micro-renewals etc.,while the architects also employed quite different strategies and approaches.I prefer to think in-depth about the concrete and real relationship between architecture,the city,the site and daily life in the design.In the process of addressing practical problems (even small ones),the significance of architecture to the city and its citizens can be revealed simply and naturally,which often gives architecture its strength.This year's selection was conducted online and the discussion among the jurors was quite candid.The winner was awarded to a temporary building that,despite concerns about controversy and inappropriate imitation,won recognition for its positive contribution to the vitality and spatial quality of the urban community's daily life.(Translated by Dandan Wang)

鮑里斯·沙德-賓索夫WA城市貢獻(xiàn)獎(jiǎng)評(píng)委德國(guó)《建筑世界》雜志主編

Boris Schade-Bünsow Jury member of WA City Regeneration Award Editor-in-Chief,Bauwelt

我非常榮幸能與尊敬的中國(guó)教授和建筑師一起擔(dān)任WA 中國(guó)建筑獎(jiǎng)的評(píng)審。WA 城市貢獻(xiàn)獎(jiǎng)向公共建筑致敬：該獎(jiǎng)項(xiàng)表彰了中國(guó)越來(lái)越多具有社會(huì)價(jià)值的優(yōu)秀建筑和城市更新項(xiàng)目。入圍項(xiàng)目和獲獎(jiǎng)作品即使規(guī)模不大或非臨時(shí)建筑，也具有很高的社會(huì)意義。該建筑在歷史結(jié)構(gòu)復(fù)原及新建筑語(yǔ)言的應(yīng)用方面，成功地將日常生活方向與場(chǎng)所感相結(jié)合。通過(guò)探索輕量化的快速干預(yù)，以最少的干預(yù)手段為城市空間帶來(lái)最大的影響，并為日?；顒?dòng)提供場(chǎng)地。（王單單 譯）

I'm most honoured to participate in the WAACA jury,collaborating with the honourable professors and architects from China.The WAACA 2020 City Regeneration Award pays tribute to architecture as a public act:The award recognises the growing number of extraordinary buildings and urban renewal projects in China with an added social value.The shortlisted and award-winning projects have a high societal relevance,even if they are small of scale,if not temporary.This architecture succeeds to combine an everyday life orientation with a sense of place,whether restoring historical structures or operating with a new architectural language.Quick and light interventions are being explored to achieve the greatest impact on urban space with the least means and to provide shelter for daily activities.

沈迪WA城市貢獻(xiàn)獎(jiǎng)評(píng)委全國(guó)工程勘察設(shè)計(jì)大師華東建筑集團(tuán)股份有限公司總建筑師

SHEN Di Jury member of WA City Regeneration Award National Engineering Survey and Design Master Chief Architect,Arcplus Group PLC.

這是一次讓我感受到在評(píng)選參評(píng)項(xiàng)目的同時(shí)，也在檢視評(píng)委自身設(shè)計(jì)價(jià)值觀的評(píng)優(yōu)活動(dòng)。從本次評(píng)獎(jiǎng)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)到參選的設(shè)計(jì)作品都清晰地反映出這個(gè)特點(diǎn)。當(dāng)我在面對(duì)一個(gè)個(gè)參賽作品進(jìn)行相互比較時(shí)，始終在考問(wèn)自己：在當(dāng)下，對(duì)于建筑設(shè)計(jì)我們應(yīng)該提倡什么？在衡量每個(gè)作品建筑設(shè)計(jì)水平的高低中，專(zhuān)業(yè)維度與社會(huì)維度的權(quán)重關(guān)系又是如何？?jī)烧哧P(guān)系的統(tǒng)一度是否也決定了各個(gè)設(shè)計(jì)作品的高低？我們平時(shí)所關(guān)注的設(shè)計(jì)創(chuàng)意和技術(shù)創(chuàng)新是否就是這一結(jié)合度的表達(dá)，而不是創(chuàng)意與創(chuàng)新本身？其實(shí)，這些關(guān)于建筑學(xué)本體方面的哲學(xué)意味的考問(wèn)，對(duì)今天我們建筑設(shè)計(jì)領(lǐng)域來(lái)說(shuō)非常必要，這不僅關(guān)系到今天的建筑設(shè)計(jì)目的與意義，也影響著建筑設(shè)計(jì)未來(lái)的方向，我們太需要這方面的思考和自省。回顧評(píng)獎(jiǎng)工作的過(guò)程，也讓我看到WA 城市貢獻(xiàn)獎(jiǎng)強(qiáng)調(diào)建筑對(duì)社會(huì)的意義的原則立場(chǎng)不僅成為該獎(jiǎng)項(xiàng)的特點(diǎn)，也是它存在的意義。

During the review event,I perceived the jury was also examining their own values of design while selecting the entries.This was clearly reflected in the criteria of the evaluation of the submitted design works.When comparing one of the entries with another,I was always questioning myself:what should we advocate for architectural design at the present? In measuring the level of each architectural design (high,medium and low),what is the relation between the weight of the professional dimension and social dimension? Does the degree of unity in the relationship between the two also determine the level of each design work? Is it the expression of this integration of design creativity and technological innovation that we usually pay attention to,rather than the creativity and innovation per se? In fact,these philosophical questions about the ontology of architecture are very necessary for today's architectural field.This is not only related to the purpose and significance of the current architectural design,but also affects its future direction.We truly need this kind of thinking and introspection.Reviewing the process of the selection,I also see that the WA City Regeneration Award's principle of emphasising the significance of architecture to society has not only become the feature of the award,but also the meaning of its existence.(Translated by Dandan Wang)

朱锫WA城市貢獻(xiàn)獎(jiǎng)評(píng)委中央美術(shù)學(xué)院建筑學(xué)院院長(zhǎng)、教授朱锫建筑設(shè)計(jì)事務(wù)所創(chuàng)始人、主持建筑師

ZHU Pei Jury member of WA City Regeneration Award Dean,Professor,School of Architecture,Central Academy of Fine Arts Founding Principal,Studio Zhu Pei

從當(dāng)代建筑學(xué)的角度而言，所謂“城市貢獻(xiàn)獎(jiǎng)”應(yīng)該授予那些能夠敏銳感悟到特定地域文化與氣候根源，并采用實(shí)驗(yàn)性、批判性的方法將其融入到自己的建筑創(chuàng)作過(guò)程中，以實(shí)現(xiàn)從生態(tài)、文化的角度上建構(gòu)當(dāng)代建筑、城市的可持續(xù)發(fā)展的建筑作品。此次WA 城市貢獻(xiàn)獎(jiǎng)的獲獎(jiǎng)作品，雖然在建筑材料、空間語(yǔ)言、結(jié)構(gòu)形式的詩(shī)意化、藝術(shù)性表達(dá)上都相別較大，但是，它們?cè)趯?duì)待歷史、傳統(tǒng)及自然氣候環(huán)境的關(guān)注上都顯示出共同的興趣，也在不同程度上表達(dá)了自己對(duì)建筑理解的角度，令人深受啟發(fā)。

From the perspective of contemporary architecture,"City Regeneration Award" should be awarded to those works that can keenly understand the roots of specific regional culture and climate,and integrate them into their own architectural creation process with experimental and critical approaches,so as to realize the contemporary architecture with ecological and cultural sustainability.Although the award-winning works are quite different in terms of the poetic and artistic expression of building materials,spatial language and structural forms,they all show common interest in paying attention to history,tradition and climate,and express their understanding of architecture to varying degrees,which is deeply inspiring.(Translated by Dandan Wang)

孟建民WA居住貢獻(xiàn)獎(jiǎng)評(píng)委中國(guó)工程院院士全國(guó)建筑設(shè)計(jì)大師深圳市建筑設(shè)計(jì)研究總院有限公司總建筑師

MENG Jianmin Jury member of WA Housing Award Academician,Chinese Academy of Engineering National Engineering Survey and Design Master Chief Architect,Shenzhen General Institute of Architectural Design and Research Co.Ltd

感謝《世界建筑》邀請(qǐng)我參加2020WA 中國(guó)建筑獎(jiǎng)的評(píng)選。我一直倡導(dǎo)“建筑服務(wù)于人”的本原設(shè)計(jì)思想，強(qiáng)調(diào)在建筑設(shè)計(jì)中應(yīng)充分考慮健康、高效與人文三要素。這次評(píng)選中，我們多位評(píng)委在近400 項(xiàng)的設(shè)計(jì)作品中甄選出了50 多項(xiàng)建筑佳作，這些作品展現(xiàn)著國(guó)內(nèi)建筑師對(duì)公眾、對(duì)居住、對(duì)城市、對(duì)社會(huì)等各方面的設(shè)計(jì)思考與大膽探索，成為中國(guó)當(dāng)代建筑發(fā)展史上的重要素材。同時(shí)，從這些獲獎(jiǎng)作品中，我們看到了中國(guó)建筑經(jīng)過(guò)數(shù)十年的發(fā)展，正逐步走向多元，走向世界。WA 中國(guó)建筑獎(jiǎng)自2002 年創(chuàng)立以來(lái)，已成為國(guó)內(nèi)最受關(guān)注的建筑獎(jiǎng)項(xiàng)之一，是中國(guó)當(dāng)代建筑發(fā)展的見(jiàn)證者與推動(dòng)者。祝愿WA 中國(guó)建筑獎(jiǎng)越辦越好！

I would like to extend my thanks toWorld Architecturefor inviting me to participate in the selection of the 2020 WA Awards for Chinese Architecture.I have always advocated the fundamental design idea of "architecture serving people",emphasising the importance of health,efficiency and humanity in architectural design.More than 60 architectural masterpieces were selected from nearly 400 entries by our jury.These works demonstrate Chinese architects' design thinking and bold exploration of the public,residential,urban,social and other aspects of architecture,and become important materials in the history of Chinese contemporary architecture.At the same time,from these award-winning works we can see that after decades of development,Chinese architecture is gradually diversifying and reaching out to the world.Since its establishment in 2002,the WA Awards for Chinese Architecture has become one of the most popular domestic architectural awards,serving as a witness and promoter for the development of contemporary architecture in China.I look forward to the WA Awards for Chinese Architecture's bright future! (Translated by Dandan Wang)

陳雄WA居住貢獻(xiàn)獎(jiǎng)評(píng)委全國(guó)工程勘察設(shè)計(jì)大師廣東省建筑設(shè)計(jì)研究院副院長(zhǎng)、總建筑師

CHEN Xiong Jury member of WA Housing Award National Engineering Survey and Design Master Vice President,Chief Architect,Architectural Design &Research Institute of Guangdong Province (GDAD)

雖然是第一次參加WA 中國(guó)建筑獎(jiǎng)的評(píng)審，但之前一直都有關(guān)注這個(gè)獎(jiǎng)項(xiàng)和獲獎(jiǎng)作品，參加評(píng)審有機(jī)會(huì)看到同行的前沿實(shí)踐和前衛(wèi)思考。居住建筑在評(píng)優(yōu)上具有相當(dāng)大的挑戰(zhàn)，有些設(shè)計(jì)理念和手法容易趨同而難于比較選擇，所幸的是參賽作品多元而具有品質(zhì)。獲得優(yōu)勝獎(jiǎng)的“廣州蒙圣住宅改造”，是建筑師在極其有限的條件下于歷史街區(qū)內(nèi)進(jìn)行的一棟極小住宅的改造實(shí)踐。它作為一個(gè)城市微更新的樣本，對(duì)當(dāng)下防止大拆大建的城市更新是一個(gè)很好的啟示。同樣是舊改更新，“紫泥十二門(mén)無(wú)界社區(qū)”探討了居住與多功能空間以及朋友聚落的結(jié)合，是一種非典型的居住類(lèi)型?！皳瓷帷つ隙U觀水”項(xiàng)目是老宅子改擴(kuò)建為民宿，解構(gòu)重構(gòu)中傳承了歷史文化遺產(chǎn)的精髓，賦予居住功能與空間新的含義。“蘇州萬(wàn)科大家”項(xiàng)目也是演繹了傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代結(jié)合的歷史城市創(chuàng)新發(fā)展特質(zhì)。后3 個(gè)項(xiàng)目獲得了佳作獎(jiǎng)，加上入圍的多個(gè)項(xiàng)目，從不同維度探索了以居住為主題的建筑設(shè)計(jì)實(shí)踐。WA 中國(guó)建筑獎(jiǎng)以相對(duì)獨(dú)立的視角為我們提供了豐富且可供借鑒的建筑學(xué)借鑒意義。

Although this was my first time participating in the review of the WA Awards for Chinese Architecture,I had always paid attention to this award and the prize-winning works.Bing a juror gave me the opportunity to see the cutting-edge practice and avant-garde ideas of my peers.The selection of residential buildings was quite challenging:the design concepts and techniques tended to be similar,and it became difficult to compare and select.Fortunately,the entries were diverse and of high quality.The Renovation of Guangzhou Mengsheng House project that won the Winner prize is a renovation of a very small house in a historical neighbourhood of Guangzhou.Under extremely limited conditions,the architect's inspiration for the current urban renewal served to prevent large-scale demolition and construction,providing an example of urban micro-renewal.Likewise,the renewal project of the Borderless Community of Zi Ni Twelve Gates is an atypical residential building,which explores the combination of living,multi-functional space and friends' gathering.The Sincere Hotel transforms an old house into a guesthouse,inheriting the essence of historical and cultural heritage in the deconstruction and reconstruction,while giving a new meaning to the function and space of living.Furthermore,the Vanke Dajia project also illustrates the characteristics of the innovative development of historical cities combining tradition and modernity.The latter three projects received the prize of Highly Commended,and,together with the shortlisted projects,all explored the architectural design practice with the theme of residence from different dimensions.The WA Awards for Chinese Architecture provides us with a rich and extensive architectural reference from a relatively independent perspective.(Translated by Dandan Wang)

孔宇航WA居住貢獻(xiàn)獎(jiǎng)評(píng)委天津大學(xué)建筑學(xué)院院長(zhǎng)、教授

KONG Yuhang Jury member of WA Housing Award Dean,Professor,School of Architecture,Tianjin University

在城市更新與文化復(fù)興的語(yǔ)境下，本屆WA 建筑獎(jiǎng)的獲獎(jiǎng)作品均有在設(shè)計(jì)理念與形式語(yǔ)言方面兼顧傳統(tǒng)的作品問(wèn)世。“大隱于市”在高密度的老舊歷史街區(qū)中建造了一棟微型住宅，在有限的用地范圍內(nèi)進(jìn)行垂直空間生成，關(guān)注日常生活與城市景觀。運(yùn)用垂直疊合的方式，進(jìn)行空間嵌套；獨(dú)特的“采光斗”巧妙地將天光層層滲透至底層空間，構(gòu)建了緊湊而巧妙的生活場(chǎng)景?！皳瓷帷つ隙U觀水”屬民宿設(shè)計(jì)類(lèi)型，方案在原有院落結(jié)構(gòu)中，置入由木材與玻璃構(gòu)成的方體，在優(yōu)化界面的同時(shí)，使室內(nèi)外空間相互滲透，形成豐富的景構(gòu)。平面布局疏密有致，不同庭院層層遞進(jìn)，結(jié)合園林置景手法將傳統(tǒng)空間意象與當(dāng)代材料有效并置?！疤K州萬(wàn)科大家”項(xiàng)目以中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)屋頂為原型，結(jié)合當(dāng)代工藝，營(yíng)建出具有秩序感與儀式性的空間序列與場(chǎng)所感。從詩(shī)意棲居到園林轉(zhuǎn)譯，再到城市微更新，獲獎(jiǎng)?wù)咭孕碌男问交貞?yīng)生活的日常、文化的記憶與復(fù)雜的環(huán)境，對(duì)中國(guó)未來(lái)城市具有一定的示范意義。

In the context of urban renewal and cultural revitalisation,the winning entries of this year's WA Awards greatly respond to the tradition of Chinese culture.The Renovation of Guangzhou Mengsheng House creates a micro apartment in a high-density historic district,applying vertical stacking for spatial nesting to construct a subtle place.The Sincere Hotel inserts boxes made of wood and glass in the original courtyard organically.The Vanke Dajia,combined with contemporary techniques,reconstructs the model from the prototype traditional Chinese roof.Overall,the three projects respond to cultural memory,daily-life,and a complex environment,generating the poetic atmosphere and casting a glimmer of light towards the future of Chinese urban renewal.(English Proofread by Dandan Wang)

申作偉WA居住貢獻(xiàn)獎(jiǎng)評(píng)委全國(guó)工程勘察設(shè)計(jì)大師山東大衛(wèi)國(guó)際建筑設(shè)計(jì)公司董事長(zhǎng)兼總建筑師

SHEN Zuowei Jury member of WA Housing Award National Engineering Survey and Design Master President,Chief Architect,Shandong Dawei International Architecture Design Co.,Ltd.

這次參加WA 中國(guó)建筑獎(jiǎng)的評(píng)審活動(dòng)，我倍感榮幸，也深有感觸。首先，居住貢獻(xiàn)獎(jiǎng)參賽作品的種類(lèi)之豐富超出我的預(yù)期，從私人住宅到商品房，從城市到鄉(xiāng)村，有新建也有舊房改造，既有為社會(huì)新人設(shè)計(jì)的公寓，又有為老年人設(shè)計(jì)的住房，這深刻反映了建筑師們對(duì)城市更新、適老化設(shè)計(jì)等國(guó)家政策的理解與把握，體現(xiàn)了強(qiáng)烈的社會(huì)責(zé)任感；其次，可以看到建筑師們?cè)趪L試多方面的創(chuàng)新，有的利用本土化的設(shè)計(jì)語(yǔ)言體現(xiàn)文化自覺(jué)、文化自信，有的嘗試將綠色節(jié)能減排理念與人居空間做更好的結(jié)合，探索未來(lái)住宅的發(fā)展方向，這些都為居住建筑的設(shè)計(jì)創(chuàng)新提供了很多可能性；最后，作為一名堅(jiān)持工作在一線的建筑師，我一直強(qiáng)調(diào)居住建筑是最具人文關(guān)懷的建筑，在其設(shè)計(jì)中一定要加強(qiáng)對(duì)人體尺度、行為模式、生活習(xí)慣、家庭成長(zhǎng)等方面的設(shè)計(jì)關(guān)注，希望在以后的參賽作品中能看到更多在這些方面的設(shè)計(jì)突破。

I was honoured to participate in the review of the WA Awards for Chinese Architecture,and I was deeply impressed.First of all,the abundance of the WA Housing Award entries was beyond my expectation.From private residential to commercial housing,from the city to the countryside,there are newly-built structures and renovation projects;there are apartments designed for newcomers to society as well as housing designed for the elderly.It fully reflects the architects' understanding and grasp of national policies such as urban renewal and design for the aged,presenting a strong sense of social responsibility.Second,I can see architects attempting to innovate in different fashions:some use local design language to showcase cultural awareness and confidence,while others try to better combine the concept of green energy conservation and emission reduction with the living space to explore the direction of development for future housing.All these aspects provide many possibilities for the design innovation of residential buildings.Lastly,as an architect who insists on working at the front line,I have always emphasised residential buildings represent the most humanistic form of architecture.In its design,we must pay more attention to the human scale,behavioural patterns,living habits,family growth and other aspects.I look forward to seeing more design breakthroughs in these aspects in future entries.(Translated by Dandan Wang)

張彤WA居住貢獻(xiàn)獎(jiǎng)評(píng)委東南大學(xué)建筑學(xué)院院長(zhǎng)、教授

ZHANG Tong Jury member of WA Housing Award Dean,Professor,School of Architecture,Southeast University

居住建筑在中國(guó)當(dāng)代建筑中一直有點(diǎn)畸形。一段時(shí)間里住宅設(shè)計(jì)很少面對(duì)住在里面的人，而是服務(wù)于資本和市場(chǎng)的需求?？上驳氖沁@次參評(píng)WA 居住貢獻(xiàn)獎(jiǎng)的35 個(gè)作品，大部分都有居住者，這讓我倍感興趣。這些作品關(guān)注到居住的方方面面，尤其有價(jià)值的是關(guān)乎社會(huì)公平和民生福祉的類(lèi)型，如養(yǎng)老院、棚戶(hù)區(qū)改造和鄉(xiāng)村農(nóng)宅。需要著重提及的是，不少作品對(duì)存量化時(shí)代的舊建筑更新改造做出了令人欣喜的探索，獲得優(yōu)勝獎(jiǎng)和佳作獎(jiǎng)的作品無(wú)疑是其中最突出的代表。

Residential buildings have always been somewhat awkward in Chinese contemporary architecture.For a while,residential design was less about the people who lived in it,and more about serving the needs of capital and the market.What is nice is that most of the 35 entries for the WA Housing Award have given consideration to residents,which was of particular interest to me.These works focus on all aspects of living,and are especially valuable in building types related to social equity and well-being,such as nursing homes,shantytown transformations and rural housing.It should be emphasised that many projects have gratifyingly explored the renewal and transformation of old buildings in the era of inventory renewal,and the works that won the Winner prize and the Highly Commended prize are undoubtedly the most outstanding representatives.(Translated by Dandan Wang)