黃婷苗， 鄭險(xiǎn)峰*， 侯仰毅 ， 李 曉， 王朝輝, 2

(1西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)資源環(huán)境學(xué)院/農(nóng)業(yè)部西北植物營(yíng)養(yǎng)與農(nóng)業(yè)環(huán)境重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室，陜西楊凌 712100；2西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)， 旱區(qū)作物逆境生物學(xué)國(guó)家重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室，陜西楊凌 712100)

秸稈還田對(duì)冬小麥產(chǎn)量和氮、磷、鉀吸收利用的影響

黃婷苗1， 鄭險(xiǎn)峰1*， 侯仰毅1， 李 曉1， 王朝輝1, 2

(1西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)資源環(huán)境學(xué)院/農(nóng)業(yè)部西北植物營(yíng)養(yǎng)與農(nóng)業(yè)環(huán)境重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室，陜西楊凌 712100；2西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)， 旱區(qū)作物逆境生物學(xué)國(guó)家重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室，陜西楊凌 712100)

秸稈還田； 冬小麥； 產(chǎn)量； 養(yǎng)分吸收； 養(yǎng)分調(diào)控

1 材料與方法

1.1 試驗(yàn)時(shí)間、地點(diǎn)

圖1 2011年7月2013年5月試驗(yàn)地點(diǎn)降水量Fig.1 The monthly precipitation from July 2011 to May 2013 at the experimental site[注(Note)： 資料來源于周至縣氣象局 Data from Meteorological Administration of Zhouzhi County, Shaanxi Province.]

1.2 試驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì)

1.3 測(cè)定項(xiàng)目與方法

1.3.1 土壤樣品 試驗(yàn)開始前(2011年10月)，采用5點(diǎn)混合法取0—20 cm土層基礎(chǔ)土樣，風(fēng)干后分別過1 mm和0.25 mm篩。有機(jī)質(zhì)含量用油浴加熱—重鉻酸鉀容量法；全氮用濃硫酸消煮—半微量開氏法；硝態(tài)氮用1 mol/L氯化鉀浸提—連續(xù)流動(dòng)分析儀測(cè)定；有效磷用0.5 mol/L碳酸氫鈉提取—鉬銻抗比色法；速效鉀用1 mol/L乙酸銨提取—火焰光度法；pH(水土比為2.5 ∶1)用電位法；土壤容重用環(huán)刀法測(cè)定[17]。

1.3.2 植株樣品 于冬小麥出苗后在各小區(qū)隨機(jī)選取3個(gè)1 m長(zhǎng)的樣段，并標(biāo)記，用于調(diào)查小麥田間分蘗數(shù)。在成熟期(2012年6月5日，2013年5月27日)采集植株樣品，各小區(qū)隨機(jī)選取3個(gè)1 m2具有代表性的樣點(diǎn)，風(fēng)干后用脫粒機(jī)脫粒、稱重；取部分籽粒樣品，于65℃烘干至恒重，測(cè)定水分含量，計(jì)算小麥籽粒產(chǎn)量。同時(shí)，每個(gè)小區(qū)隨機(jī)采集3個(gè)1 m長(zhǎng)的樣段混合后，沿根莖結(jié)合處剪掉根系，將地上部作為一個(gè)分析樣品，風(fēng)干后分為籽粒、莖葉和穎殼三部分，分別稱重后，各取部分樣，于65℃烘干至恒重，計(jì)算各處理小麥?zhǔn)斋@指數(shù)。各部位烘干樣粉碎后，用濃H2SO4-H2O2消煮，AA3連續(xù)流動(dòng)分析儀測(cè)定氮、磷含量，火焰光度計(jì)測(cè)定鉀含量。小麥籽粒氮、磷、鉀含量，產(chǎn)量和生物量均以65℃烘干后的干物質(zhì)量表示。

1.4 數(shù)據(jù)處理

地上部吸氮(磷、鉀)量(kg/hm2)=[籽粒含氮(磷、鉀)量(g/kg)×籽粒產(chǎn)量(kg/hm2)+莖葉含氮(磷、鉀)量(g/kg)×莖葉生物量(kg/hm2)+穎殼含氮(磷、鉀)量(g/kg)×穎殼生物量(kg/hm2)]/1000

氮(磷、鉀)收獲指數(shù)(%)=籽粒吸氮(磷、鉀)量(kg/hm2)/地上部吸氮(磷、鉀)量(kg/hm2)×100[18]

試驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)用Excel 2007進(jìn)行處理，SAS 8.1軟件進(jìn)行方差分析，作圖工具為Sigmaplot 12.0。

圖2 玉米秸稈還田對(duì)冬小麥籽粒產(chǎn)量的影響Fig.2 Effects of the maize straw return to soil on grain yield of winter wheat[注(Note)： S0—玉米秸稈不還田Without maize straw return; S1—玉米秸稈還田With maize straw return. 圖中不同小、大寫字母分別表示秸稈不還田和秸稈還田條件下氮水平間的差異達(dá)5%顯著水平Different small and capital letters indicate differences among different N rates at the 5% level under the straw removal treatments and straw return to soil treatments, respectively.]

2 結(jié)果與分析

2.1 小麥籽粒產(chǎn)量

對(duì)小麥產(chǎn)量和施氮量的回歸分析(圖2)發(fā)現(xiàn)，秸稈還田與不還田的肥料效應(yīng)曲線相交，與不還田相比，秸稈還田小麥有低施氮量減產(chǎn)、高氮量時(shí)增產(chǎn)的趨勢(shì)。第一年，施氮量低于N 153 kg/hm2時(shí)，秸稈還田處理的產(chǎn)量低于不還田處理，不施氮時(shí)，秸稈還田的籽粒產(chǎn)量為3427 kg/hm2，比不還田處理減少3.0%，當(dāng)施氮量高于N 153 kg/hm2時(shí)，秸稈還田處理的小麥產(chǎn)量增加，施氮量252和336 kg/hm2時(shí)，產(chǎn)量分別為7077和7320 kg/hm2，比不還田處理增加3.2%和7.2%。第二年，兩條曲線交點(diǎn)處施氮量為N 187 kg/hm2，不施氮肥時(shí)，秸稈還田的小麥產(chǎn)量為4317 kg/hm2，比不還田減產(chǎn)8.4%；施氮量為N 252和336 kg/hm2時(shí)，小麥產(chǎn)量分別為5801和5833 kg/hm2，比不還田處理增加2.4%和5.6%。由此可見，秸稈還田后小麥?zhǔn)欠裨霎a(chǎn)受氮肥用量的影響。秸稈還田與不還田兩個(gè)處理的產(chǎn)量曲線相交，施氮量低于交點(diǎn)值時(shí)，秸稈還田小麥減產(chǎn)；高于此值則增產(chǎn)，且增產(chǎn)量隨著氮肥用量的增大更加明顯。

2.2 小麥生物量

對(duì)生物量與施氮量進(jìn)行回歸分析，其結(jié)果(圖3)表明，秸稈還田對(duì)小麥生物量的影響與產(chǎn)量有相似的趨勢(shì)，即低氮降低、高氮增加。第一年，施氮量低于N 190 kg/hm2時(shí)，秸稈還田的小麥生物量降低，高于N 190 kg/hm2時(shí)，生物量增加。不施氮肥和施純氮N 84 kg/hm2時(shí)，秸稈還田處理的生物量分別為9634和13032 kg/hm2，比不還田處理降低5.0%和3.5%；施氮量提高到N 336 kg/hm2時(shí)，生物量為17732 kg/hm2，比不還田處理增加8.9%。第二年，施氮量為N 202 kg/hm2時(shí)，秸稈還田與不還田的小麥生物量(10811 kg/hm2)相等，不施氮肥時(shí)，秸稈還田的小麥生物量為8068 kg/hm2，比不還田處理降低11.3%，差異達(dá)顯著水平；施氮量為N 336 kg/hm2時(shí)，比不還田處理增加5.6%。可見，要使秸稈還田條件下的生物量高于不還田，氮肥用量應(yīng)不低于N 190 kg/hm2。

對(duì)小麥?zhǔn)斋@指數(shù)的分析表明，秸稈還田與否沒有顯著影響，但低施氮量(N 0和84 kg/hm2)時(shí)，秸稈還田的小麥?zhǔn)斋@指數(shù)有增加趨勢(shì)。施氮量為N 0、 84、 168、 252和336 kg/hm2時(shí)，第一年秸稈還田和不還田的小麥?zhǔn)斋@指數(shù)分別為35.6%、39.4%、40.9%、41.4%、41.3%和34.9%、38.6%、40.4%、41.4%、42.0%，第二年分別為53.5%、53.1%、52.7%、52.2%、51.6%和51.8%、52.2%、52.2%、52.0%和51.6%。說明秸稈還田條件下，施氮量不足N 168 kg/hm2時(shí)，由于氮素相對(duì)缺乏，小麥生長(zhǎng)受到抑制，會(huì)將有限的干物質(zhì)更多地向籽粒轉(zhuǎn)移。

圖3 玉米秸稈還田對(duì)冬小麥生物量的影響Fig.3 Effects of the maize straw return to soil on biomass of winter wheat[注(Note)： 圖中不同小、大寫字母分別表示秸稈不還田和秸稈還田條件下氮水平間的差異達(dá)5%顯著水平Different small and capital letters indicate differences among different N rates at the 5% level under the straw removal treatments and straw return to soil treatments, respectively. “#”表示同一氮水平玉米秸稈還田與不還田處理間差異達(dá)到5%顯著水平 Indicates that the differences between the maize straw return to soil and straw removal treatments under the same N rate at the 5% level. S0—玉米秸稈不還田Without maize straw return; S1—玉米秸稈還田With maize straw return.]

2.3 小麥冬前分蘗與產(chǎn)量構(gòu)成要素

表1表明，秸稈還田對(duì)小麥冬前分蘗和公頃穗數(shù)的影響也呈現(xiàn)出低氮降低，高氮增加的趨勢(shì)，在試驗(yàn)的第2年更為明顯。第一年，不施氮秸稈還田處理的冬前分蘗和公頃穗數(shù)分別比不還田處理降低7.9%和17.3%，第二年，不施氮肥和施氮量N 84 kg/hm2時(shí)，冬前分蘗分別降低6.8%和6.0%，公頃穗數(shù)分別降低10.3%和5.1%，但當(dāng)施氮量增至N 252 kg/hm2時(shí)，小麥穗數(shù)比不還田處理增加11.0%，差異達(dá)顯著水平。

2.4 小麥籽粒氮、磷、鉀含量

表1 小麥冬前分蘗數(shù)和公頃穗數(shù)Table 1 Tiller number before winter and spike number per hectare

注(Note): S0—玉米秸稈不還田Without maize straw return; S1—玉米秸稈還田With maize straw return. 同行數(shù)據(jù)后不同大寫字母表示玉米秸稈還田與不還田的差異達(dá)5%顯著水平 Values followed by different capital letters in same row are significantly different between treatments of the maize straw return to soil or not at the 5% level in the same year; 同列數(shù)據(jù)后不同小寫字母表示氮水平間的差異達(dá)5%顯著水平Values followed by different small letters in a column are significantly different among different N rates at the 5% level.

表2 小麥籽粒氮、磷、鉀含量(g/kg)Table 2 Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in wheat grain

注(Note): S0—玉米秸稈不還田Without maize straw return; S1—玉米秸稈還田With maize straw return. 同行數(shù)據(jù)后不同大寫字母表示玉米秸稈還田與不還田的差異達(dá)5%顯著水平Values followed by different capital letters in same row are significantly different between treatments of the maize straw return to soil or not at the 5% level in the same year; 同列數(shù)據(jù)后不同小寫字母表示氮水平間的差異達(dá)5%顯著水平Values followed by different small letters in a column are significantly different among different N rates at the 5% level.

2.5 小麥氮素吸收與利用

從圖4可以看出，在低氮量時(shí)，秸稈還田較秸稈不還田處理的小麥地上部吸氮量降低，施氮量高時(shí)則相反。前后兩年氮肥用量分別低于N 275和200 kg/hm2時(shí)，秸稈還田的小麥吸氮量低于不還田；第一年，施氮量為N 168 kg/hm2時(shí)，小麥吸氮量比不還田處理顯著降低13.6%，第二年不施氮肥和施氮N 84 kg/hm2時(shí)，分別降低8.2%和5.4%。兩年氮肥用量分別高于N 275和200 kg/hm2時(shí)，秸稈還田的小麥吸氮量增加，施氮N 336 kg/hm2時(shí)，第一年和第二年的吸氮量分別比不還田處理增加6.4%和10.3%。可見，由于還田的秸稈腐解需要消耗一部分氮素，導(dǎo)致小麥地上部吸氮量降低、氮素累積下降，但施氮量充足時(shí)，這一影響不僅可以消除，秸稈還田還能促進(jìn)小麥吸收更多的氮素。

圖4 玉米秸稈還田對(duì)冬小麥地上部吸氮量的影響Fig.4 Effects of the maize straw return to soil on nitrogen uptake in aboveground of winter wheat[注(Note)： 圖中不同小、大寫字母分別表示秸稈不還田和秸稈還田條件下氮水平間的差異達(dá)5%顯著水平 Different small and capital letters indicate differences among different N rates at the 5% level under the straw removal treatments and straw return to soil treatments, respectively. “#”表示同一氮水平玉米秸稈還田與不還田處理間差異達(dá)到5%顯著水平 Indicates that the differences among means of the maize straw return to soil and straw removal treatments under the same N rate at the 5% level. S0—玉米秸稈不還田Without maize straw return; S1—玉米秸稈還田With maize straw return.]

試驗(yàn)結(jié)果還表明，秸稈還田的氮收獲指數(shù)在低施氮量時(shí)增加，施氮量高時(shí)無差異。第一年秸稈還田和不還田不同施氮水平的氮素收獲指數(shù)分別為78.1%、81.4%、79.7%、79.1%、79.0%和73.9%、78.9%、82.2%、78.3%、76.0%，第二年分別為82.3%、82.4%、79.5%、79.1%、79.2%和80.9%、80.0%、80.1%、79.1%、79.6%。說明施氮量低時(shí)，作物氮素營(yíng)養(yǎng)不足，秸稈還田小麥將更多的氮素轉(zhuǎn)向籽粒，以保證籽粒正常生長(zhǎng)所需的氮營(yíng)養(yǎng)。

2.6 小麥磷素吸收與利用

秸稈還田對(duì)磷的收獲指數(shù)亦無顯著影響，但施氮量較低(N 0和84 kg/hm2)時(shí)，與不還田相比，秸稈還田的磷收獲指數(shù)有增加趨勢(shì)。隨著施氮量的增加，第一年，秸稈還田和不還田的磷收獲指數(shù)分別為69.0%、75.0%、74.0%、78.4%、80.7%和67.0%、73.4%、74.5%、77.6%、79.1%，第二年分別為89.1%、87.6%、87.3%、87.2%、86.6%和87.1%、87.0%、87.1%、87.8%、86.1%。

圖5 玉米秸稈還田對(duì)冬小麥地上部吸磷量的影響Fig.5 Effects of the maize straw return to soil on phosphorus uptake in aboveground of winter wheat[注(Note)： 圖中不同小、大寫字母分別表示秸稈不還田和秸稈還田條件下氮水平間的差異達(dá)5%顯著水平 Different small and capital letters indicate differences among different N rates at the 5% level under the straw removal treatments and straw return to soil treatments, respectively. “#”表示同一氮水平玉米秸稈還田與不還田處理間差異達(dá)到5%顯著水平 Indicates that the differences among means of the maize straw return to soil and straw removal treatments under the same N rate at the 5% level. S0—玉米秸稈不還田Without maize straw return; S1—玉米秸稈還田With maize straw return.]

2.7 小麥鉀素吸收與利用

圖6 玉米秸稈還田對(duì)冬小麥地上部吸鉀量的影響Fig.6 Effects of the maize straw return to soil on potassium uptake in aboveground of winter wheat[注(Note)： 圖中不同小、大寫字母分別表示秸稈不還田和秸稈還田條件下氮水平間的差異達(dá)5%顯著水平Different small and capital letters indicate differences among different N rates at the 5% level under the straw removal treatments and straw return to soil treatments, respectively. S0—玉米秸稈不還田Without maize straw return; S1—玉米秸稈還田With maize straw return.]

低氮時(shí)秸稈還田處理的鉀收獲指數(shù)增加，尤其在試驗(yàn)持續(xù)到第二年時(shí)更加明顯，高氮量時(shí)無顯著影響。不同氮水平時(shí)，第一年秸稈還田與不還田的鉀收獲指數(shù)分別為16.4%、15.5%、13.1%、16.3%、13.8%和15.1%、15.1%、15.4%、12.8%、12.5%，第二年分別為21.2%、21.6%、19.4%、18.5%、17.5%和19.9%、19.6%、19.5%、18.4%、17.2%。說明施氮量低時(shí)，秸稈還田的小麥莖葉中鉀素殘留減少，向籽粒轉(zhuǎn)移的比例增加。

3 討論

3.1 秸稈還田的小麥產(chǎn)量及其構(gòu)成要素

在產(chǎn)量構(gòu)成要素中，同一施氮水平時(shí)，秸稈還田對(duì)小麥的穗粒數(shù)和千粒重沒有明顯影響，而穗數(shù)表現(xiàn)為低氮量下減少，施氮量高時(shí)增加，與產(chǎn)量的變化趨勢(shì)一致。說明公頃穗數(shù)變化是影響秸稈還田小麥產(chǎn)量的直接原因。主要是因?yàn)榈夭蛔銜r(shí)，在小麥生長(zhǎng)前期，如有新鮮有機(jī)物的加入，使微生物活動(dòng)加強(qiáng)，土壤養(yǎng)分過度消耗，后期氮素供應(yīng)不足，導(dǎo)致形成的無效分蘗增多、有效穗數(shù)降低[20]；氮素充足時(shí)，不僅滿足了微生物分解秸稈需要的氮素，充足的氮素也可保障小麥正常生長(zhǎng)，穗數(shù)增加。在山東泰安的試驗(yàn)發(fā)現(xiàn)，施氮量較高時(shí)(N 240 kg/hm2)，玉米秸稈還田耙耕處理小麥穗數(shù)增加6.7%，產(chǎn)量增加4.7%[21]。因此，玉米秸稈還田條件下，根據(jù)目標(biāo)產(chǎn)量，同時(shí)應(yīng)補(bǔ)充供微生物活動(dòng)和作物正常生長(zhǎng)需要的氮素，是獲得小麥增產(chǎn)的關(guān)鍵。

3.2 秸稈還田小麥籽粒氮磷鉀含量及其吸收利用

本試驗(yàn)中，秸稈還田對(duì)小麥籽粒氮磷鉀含量均無明顯影響，但第一年施氮量分別低于N 275、123和213 kg/hm2，第二年分別低于N 200、165和241 kg/hm2時(shí)，秸稈還田小麥氮、磷、鉀吸收量降低，超過這一施氮量時(shí)，氮磷鉀吸收量增加。河南小麥玉米輪作試驗(yàn)發(fā)現(xiàn)，不施氮肥，秸稈還田小麥地上部吸氮量降低7.6%，施氮量提高到N 270和360 kg/hm2時(shí)，地上部吸氮量分別增加5.5%和7.9%[10]。印度西北部田間試驗(yàn)也證明，稻草不還田、推薦施氮N 120 kg/hm2時(shí)，還田小麥吸氮量降低9.8%，氮肥利用率降低21%[22]?？梢?，由于秸稈腐解需要消耗氮素，氮肥不足時(shí)，土壤中可利用的氮素減少，抑制了作物地上部氮的吸收和累積。氮磷、氮鉀間也存在明顯的正交互作用[23]，氮素不足導(dǎo)致小麥磷鉀吸收降低。氮肥充足時(shí)，一方面可為土壤提供足夠的養(yǎng)分“源”[24]，另一方面，可促進(jìn)對(duì)磷鉀吸收[25-26]。本研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，低氮時(shí)秸稈還田有增加氮磷鉀收獲指數(shù)的趨勢(shì)。說明生長(zhǎng)后期土壤氮素供應(yīng)不足、難以滿足作物的氮營(yíng)養(yǎng)需求時(shí)，小麥會(huì)將吸收的養(yǎng)分更多地從莖稈轉(zhuǎn)運(yùn)到籽粒。田間水稻試驗(yàn)也發(fā)現(xiàn)，不施氮肥時(shí)，與小麥秸稈不還田相比，秸稈還田能顯著提高水稻氮磷鉀收獲指數(shù)[27]。

3.3 秸稈還田小麥增產(chǎn)高效的養(yǎng)分調(diào)控

4 結(jié)論

[1] 李逢雨, 孫錫發(fā), 馮文強(qiáng), 等. 麥稈、油菜稈還田腐解速率及養(yǎng)分釋放規(guī)律[J]. 植物營(yíng)養(yǎng)與肥料學(xué)報(bào), 2009, 15(2): 374-380. Li F Y, Sun X F, Feng W Qetal. Nutrient release patterns and decomposing rates of wheat and rapeseed straw[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2009, 15(2): 374-380.

[2] 譚德水, 金繼運(yùn), 黃紹文, 等. 不同種植制度下長(zhǎng)期施鉀與秸稈還田對(duì)作物產(chǎn)量和土壤鉀素的影響[J]. 中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué), 2007, 40(1): 133-139. Tan D S, Jin J Y, Huang S Wetal. Effect of long-term application of K fertilizer and wheat straw to soil on crop yield and soil K under different planting systems[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(1): 133-139.

[3] Malhi S S, Lemke R. Tillage, crop residue and N fertilizer effects on crop yield, nutrient uptake, soil quality and nitrous oxide gas emissions in a second 4-yr rotation cycle[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2007, 96(1-2): 269-283.

[4] 王改玲, 郝明德, 徐繼光, 洪堅(jiān)平. 保護(hù)性耕作對(duì)黃土高原南部地區(qū)小麥產(chǎn)量及土壤理化性質(zhì)的影響[J]. 植物營(yíng)養(yǎng)與肥料學(xué)報(bào), 2011, 17(3): 539-544. Wang G L, Hao M D, Xu J G, Hong J P. Effect of conservation tillage on wheat yield and soil physicochemical properties in the south of Loess Plateau[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2011, 17(3): 539-544.

[5] 董勤各, 馮浩, 杜鍵. 秸稈粉碎還田與化肥配施對(duì)冬小麥產(chǎn)量和水分利用效率的影響[J]. 農(nóng)業(yè)工程學(xué)報(bào), 2010, 26 (增刊2): 156-162. Dong Q G, Feng H, Du J. Effects of chemical fertilizer combined crushed straw application on yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2010, 26 (Supp.2): 156-162.

[6] Powlson D S, Jenkinson D S, Pruden G, Johnston A E. The effect of straw incorporation on the uptake of nitrogen by winter wheat[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1985, 36: 26-30.

[7] 鄭偉, 張靜, 劉陽, 等. 低施肥條件下秸稈還田對(duì)冬小麥旗葉衰老的影響[J]. 生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào), 2009, 29(9): 4967-4975. Zheng W, Zhang J, Liu Yetal. Physiological effects of ploughing corn straw under soil on flag-leaf resistance of winter wheat under lowly applying fertilizer condition[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(9): 4967-4975.

[8] 李少昆, 王克如, 馮聚凱, 等. 玉米秸稈還田與不同耕作方式下影響小麥出苗的因素[J]. 作物學(xué)報(bào), 2006, 32(3): 463-465. Li S K, Wang K R, Feng J Ketal. Factors affecting seeding emergence in winter wheat under different tillage patterns with maize stalk mulching returned to the field[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2006, 32(3): 463-465.

[9] 劉義國(guó), 林琪, 王寧. 秸稈還田與氮供應(yīng)對(duì)小麥灌漿期光合日變化的影響[J]. 華北農(nóng)學(xué)報(bào), 2013, 28(5): 219-223. Liu Y G, Lin Q, Wang N. Effects of straw return and N supply on diurnal variation of photosynthesis in grain filling stage of wheat[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2013, 28(5): 219-223.

[10] 趙鵬, 陳阜. 秸稈還田配施化學(xué)氮肥對(duì)冬小麥氮效率和產(chǎn)量的影響[J]. 作物學(xué)報(bào), 2008, 34(6): 1014-1018. Zhao P, Chen F. Effects of straw mulching plus nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen efficiency and grain yield in winter wheat[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica 2008, 34(6): 1014-1018.

[11] Lemke R L, VandenBygaart A J, Campbell C AetalCrop residue removal and fertilizer N: Effects on soil organic carbon in a long-term crop rotation experiment on a Udic Boroll[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2010, 135(1-2): 42-51.

[12] Roldan A, Caravaca F, Hernández M Tetal. No-tillage, crop residue additions, and legume cover cropping effects on soil quality characteristics under maize in Patzcuaro watershed (Mexico)[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2003, 72: 65-73.

[13] Fuentes M, Govaerts B, De León Fetal. Fourteen years of applying zero and conventional tillage, crop rotation and residue management systems and its effect on physical and chemical soil quality[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2009, 30: 228-237.

[14] 張鵬, 李涵, 賈志寬, 等. 秸稈還田對(duì)寧南旱區(qū)土壤有機(jī)碳含量及土壤碳礦化的影響[J]. 農(nóng)業(yè)環(huán)境科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào), 2011, 30(12): 2518-2525. Zhang P, Li H, Jia Z Ketal. Effects of straw returning on soil organic carbon and carbon mineralization in semi-arid areas of southern Ningxia, China[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2011, 30(12): 2518-2525.

[15] 王龍昌, 鄒聰明, 張?jiān)铺m, 等. 西南“旱三熟”地區(qū)不同保護(hù)性耕作措施對(duì)農(nóng)田土壤生態(tài)效應(yīng)及生產(chǎn)效應(yīng)的影響[J]. 作物學(xué)報(bào), 2013, 39(10): 1880-1890. Wang L C, Zou C M, Zhang Y Letal. Influences of conservation tillage practices on farmland soil ecological factors and productive benefits in dryland region with triple cropping system in southwest China[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013, 39(10): 1880-1890.

[16] 沈海軍. 秸稈還田和施氮量對(duì)關(guān)中灌區(qū)冬小麥產(chǎn)量形成和養(yǎng)分利用的影響[D]. 楊凌: 西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文, 2012. Shen H J. Effect of straw return and nitrogen fertilizer application on yield formation of winter wheat and nutrition use in Guanzhong irrigation area[D]. Yangling: Ms Thises of Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, 2012.

[17] 鮑士旦. 土壤農(nóng)化分析[M]. 北京: 中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)出版社, 2000. 56-57, 81-83, 106-107. Bao S D. Soil agricultural-chemical analysis[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. 56-57, 81-83, 106-107.

[18] 李鴻偉, 楊凱鵬, 曹轉(zhuǎn)勤, 等. 稻麥連作中超高產(chǎn)栽培小麥和水稻的養(yǎng)分吸收與積累特征[J]. 作物學(xué)報(bào), 2013, 39(3): 464-477. Li H W, Yang K P, Cao Z Qetal. Characteristics of nutrient uptake and accumulation in wheat and rice with continuous cropping under super-high-yielding cultivation[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013, 39(3): 464-477.

[19] Limon-Ortega A, Sayre K D, Francis C A. Wheat and maize yields in response to straw management and nitrogen under a bed planting system[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2000, 92: 295-302.

[20] 張定一, 黨建友, 王姣愛, 等. 施氮量對(duì)不同品質(zhì)類型小麥產(chǎn)量、品質(zhì)和旗葉光合作用的調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng)[J]. 植物營(yíng)養(yǎng)與肥料學(xué)報(bào), 2007, 13(4): 535-542. Zhang D Y, Dang J Y, Wang J Aetal. Regulative effect of nitrogen fertilization on grain yield, quality and photosynthesis of flag leaves in different wheat varieties[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2007, 13(4): 535-542.

[21] 韓賓, 李增嘉, 王蕓, 等. 土壤耕作及秸稈還田對(duì)冬小麥生長(zhǎng)狀況及產(chǎn)量的影響[J]. 農(nóng)業(yè)工程學(xué)報(bào), 2007, 23(2): 48-53. Han B, Li Z J, Wang Yetal. Effects of soil tillage and returning straw to soil on wheat growth status and yield[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2007, 23(2): 48-53.

[22] Bijay-Singh, Bronson K F, Yadvinder-Singhetal. Nitrogen-15 balance as affected by rice straw management in a rice-wheat rotation in northwest India[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2001, 59: 227-237.

[23] 田生昌, 馬建軍, 葉路明. 寧夏平羅春小麥氮、磷、鉀肥肥效及適宜用量[J]. 寧夏大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào) (自然科學(xué)版), 2012, 33(4): 396-399. Tian S C, Ma J J, Ye L M. Spring wheat N-P-K fertilizer efficiency and the appropriate amount for Pingluo in ningxia[J]. Journal of Ningxia University (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 33(4): 396-399.

[24] 袁玲, 張宣, 楊靜, 等. 不同栽培方式和秸稈還田對(duì)水稻產(chǎn)量和營(yíng)養(yǎng)品質(zhì)的影響[J]. 作物學(xué)報(bào), 2013, 39(2): 350-359. Yuan L, Zhang X, Yang Jetal. Effects of different cultivation methods and straw incorporation on grain yield and nutrition quality of rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013, 39(2): 350-359.

[25] Witt C, Cassman K G, Olk D Cetal. Crop rotation and residue management effects on carbon sequestration, nitrogen cycling and productivity of irrigated rice systems[J]. Plant and Soil, 2000, 225: 263-278.

[26] 楊長(zhǎng)明, 楊林章, 顏廷梅, 歐陽竹. 不同肥料結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)水稻群體干物質(zhì)生產(chǎn)及養(yǎng)分吸收分配的影響[J]. 土壤通報(bào), 2004, 35(2): 199-202. Yang C M, Yang L Z, Yan T M, Ouyang Z. Effects of nutrient regimes on dry matter production and nutrient uptake and distribution by rice plant[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2004, 35(2): 199-202.

[27] 徐國(guó)偉, 楊立年, 王志琴, 等. 麥秸還田與實(shí)施氮肥管理對(duì)水稻氮磷鉀吸收利用的影響[J]. 作物學(xué)報(bào), 2008, 34(8): 1424-1434. Xu G W, Yang L N, Wang Z Qetal. Effects of wheat-residue application and site-specific nitrogen management on absorption and utilization of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in rice plants[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(8): 1424-1434.

[28] 王立剛, 李虎, 楊黎, 等. 冬小麥/夏玉米輪作系統(tǒng)不同施氮量的長(zhǎng)期環(huán)境效應(yīng)及區(qū)域氮調(diào)控模擬[J]. 中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué), 2013, 46(14): 2932-2941. Wang L G, Li H, Yang Letal. Simulation of long-term and regional environmental effects of different N applications in the winter wheat/summer maize system[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(14): 2932-2941.

[29] 王春陽, 周建斌, 鄭險(xiǎn)峰, 李生秀. 不同栽培模式對(duì)小麥-玉米輪作體系土壤硝態(tài)氮?dú)埩舻挠绊慬J]. 植物營(yíng)養(yǎng)與肥料學(xué)報(bào), 2007, 13(6): 991-997. Wang C Y, Zhou J B, Zheng X F, Li S X. Effects of different cultivation methods on soil residual nitrate under winter wheat-summer maize cropping system[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2007, 13(6): 991-997.

[30] 同延安, 趙營(yíng), 趙護(hù)兵, 樊紅柱. 施氮量對(duì)冬小麥氮素吸收、轉(zhuǎn)運(yùn)及產(chǎn)量的影響[J]. 植物營(yíng)養(yǎng)與肥料學(xué)報(bào), 2007, 13(1): 64-69. Tong Y A, Zhao Y, Zhao H B, Fan H Z. Effect of N rates on N uptake, transformation and the yield of winter wheat[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2007, 13(1): 64-69.

Yield and N, P and K uptake and utilization of winter wheat affected by straw return to soil

HUANG Ting-miao1, ZHENG Xian-feng1*, HOU Yang-yi1, LI Xiao1, WANG Zhao-hui1,2

(1CollegeofNaturalResourcesandEnvironment,NorthwestA&FUniversity/KeyLaboratoryofPlantNutritionandAgro-environmentinNorthwestChina,MinistryofAgriculture,Yangling,Shaanxi712100,China;2NorthwestA&FUniversity/StateKeyLaboratoryofCropStressBiologyinAridAreas,Yangling,Shaanxi712100,China)

【Objectives】Guanzhong Plain in Shaanxi province is a typical winter wheat-summer maize rotation region in China, where maize straw returned to soil before winter wheat sowing is one of main crop straw management patterns. In order to increase crop yield and fertilizer utilization efficiency by optimizing nutrient management of winter wheat under the maize straw return to soil, a two-year location-fixed field experiment was carried out to explore the best nutrient management measure for high yield and high efficiency production of winter wheat when the straw was returned to soil in Guanzhong Plain. 【Methods】 The field experiment was initiated in October 2011 and ended in May 2013 at Zhongnan town, Zhouzhi county in Shaanxi province. Local winter wheat cultivar of Zhoumai 23 and summer maize cultivar of Zhengdan 958 were used as test crops. The experiment was arranged in a split block design with two main treatments and five subplots. The main treatments included all the maize straw return to soil (S1) and all straw removal treatment (S0), and the subplots were five N application rates of 0, 84, 168, 252 and 336 kg/hm2with four replicates. Effects of the maize straw return to soil on grain yield of the following wheat and its nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (N, P and K) uptake and utilization were studied. 【Results】 The results show that the winter wheat grain yield and the amounts of N, P and K uptake in aboveground part at the maturity stage are decreased when the N rate is low under the straw return, while they are increased under the high N rates, compared with the maize straw removal treatment. The grain yields are decreased under the straw return treatments when the N rates are lower than 153 and 187 kg/hm2, respectively in the first and second year, and the yields are increased when the N rates are higher than them, even with more yield increases under much higher N rates. The response of the biomass to the straw return is the same as the grain yield, and under the same amount of biomass and the maize straw return or removal, the N rates are 190 and 202 kg/hm2in the first and second year, respectively. Among the wheat yield component factors, grain number per spike and 1000-grain weight are not significantly affected by the straw return under the same N rate, while the spike number per hectare is different, and the increased grain yield under the straw return condition at higher N rate is mainly caused by the enhanced spike number. The amounts of N, P and K uptake in aboveground part of winter wheat are increased by the straw return when the N application rates are higher than 275, 123 and 213 kg/hm2in the first year and 200, 165 and 241 kg/hm2in the second year, respectively, but their harvest indexes are not in the increasing tendency under high levels of N rates. Also, the reduction of P concentration in winter wheat grain is found due to over-fertilization of nitrogen.【Conclusions】 Comprehensive consideration of the changes of winter wheat grain yield, N, P and K uptake and their utilization in aboveground part under the same N level and the straw return to soil condition, the N application rates for winter wheat are suggested to be within the range of N 150 to 200 kg/hm2in the winter wheat-summer maize rotation region of Guanzhong Plain for ensuring higher wheat yield and utilization efficiencies of N, P and K nutrient resource when the maize straw is returned to soil before winter wheat sowing.

straw return; winter wheat; yield; nutrient uptake; nutrient management

2014-03-10 接受日期： 2014-05-09 網(wǎng)絡(luò)出版日期： 2015-05-06

國(guó)家現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)體系建設(shè)專項(xiàng) (CARS-3-1-31)；國(guó)家公益性行業(yè)(農(nóng)業(yè))科研專項(xiàng)經(jīng)費(fèi)項(xiàng)目(201303104)；西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)基本科研業(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項(xiàng)(Z109021202)資助。

黃婷苗(1990—)，女，山西運(yùn)城人，碩士研究生，主要從事植物營(yíng)養(yǎng)與調(diào)控研究。E-mail: woshitmiao@163.com * 通信作者 E-mail: zhengxf@nwsuaf.edu.cn

S512.01； S141.4

A

1008-505X(2015)04-0853-11