沈 潔,紀(jì) 永,金 秋,吳輝輝
不同劑量右美托咪定在癲癇病灶切除術(shù)中的臨床研究
沈 潔1*,紀(jì) 永2,金 秋3,吳輝輝4
目的 觀察不同劑量右美托咪定(Dexmedetomidine,DEX)在皮層腦電圖監(jiān)測(cè)下行癲癇病灶切除術(shù)中對(duì)腦功能區(qū)域定位及麻醉蘇醒期的影響,旨在探討用于癲癇外科手術(shù)麻醉的適宜的右美托咪定劑量。方法 選擇因頑固性癲癇擇期開顱行病灶切除術(shù)的80例患者,隨機(jī)均分4組,分別為右美托咪定1組(D1組)、右美托咪定2組(D2組)、右美托咪定3組(D3組)和生理鹽水對(duì)照組(NS組)。DEX組麻醉誘導(dǎo)前均輸注負(fù)荷量右美托咪定0.4 μg/kg,之后D1組、D2組和D3組分別持續(xù)泵注右美托咪定0.2、0.3、0.4 μg/(kg·h),直至病灶切除硬腦膜縫合結(jié)束,NS組給予等量生理鹽水。四組患者均給予舒芬太尼、得普利麻和羅庫溴胺全麻誘導(dǎo),得普利麻靶控輸注2.0~2.5 μg/mL,瑞芬太尼3~6 μg/(kg·h)靜脈輸注,順苯磺阿曲庫胺0.5 mg/kg單次靜脈注射維持麻醉,切開硬腦膜時(shí)停止瑞芬太尼輸注,行ECoG監(jiān)測(cè)前,將得普利麻的靶濃度設(shè)為1.6 μg/mL,ECoG監(jiān)測(cè)完成后各藥物恢復(fù)之前維持劑量。手術(shù)結(jié)束后,停用所有藥物,待患者自主呼吸恢復(fù)、拔除氣管導(dǎo)管、生命體征平穩(wěn)后送入麻醉恢復(fù)室。記錄氣管插管、切皮、拔管等各時(shí)間點(diǎn)的MAP、HR、蘇醒時(shí)間、拔管時(shí)間及圍術(shù)期不良反應(yīng)例數(shù);記錄調(diào)整時(shí)間及爆發(fā)抑制發(fā)生例數(shù),選擇基線穩(wěn)定、無干擾的10 s描記圖為統(tǒng)計(jì)對(duì)象,計(jì)算各腦電波形的頻率和波幅。結(jié)果 插管即刻和拔管時(shí),DEX組HR低于NS組(P<0.05);手術(shù)結(jié)束拔除氣管導(dǎo)管時(shí),DEX組MAP低于NS組(P<0.05)。D3組患者蘇醒時(shí)間、拔管時(shí)間較NS組、D1組和D2組延長(zhǎng)(P<0.05),D1組、D2組與NS組比較、D1組與D2組比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05);D3組拔管劇烈嗆咳和躁動(dòng)例數(shù)較NS組減少(P<0.05),D2組患者躁動(dòng)例數(shù)較NS組減少(P<0.05),各組均未發(fā)生呼吸抑制和術(shù)中知曉。術(shù)中ECoG監(jiān)測(cè)顯示,各組患者棘波頻率和波幅比較差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。對(duì)照組的調(diào)整時(shí)間較DEX組延長(zhǎng)(P<0.05)。各組患者的爆發(fā)抑制發(fā)生例數(shù)比較差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。結(jié)論 右美托咪定0.2、0.3、0.4 μg/(kg·h)復(fù)合丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼對(duì)術(shù)中腦電監(jiān)測(cè)下切除癲癇病灶手術(shù)麻醉是安全有效的,其中0.3 μg/(kg·h)效果最佳。
右美托咪定;癲癇;皮層腦電圖;全憑靜脈麻醉
癲癇是一種常見的神經(jīng)系統(tǒng)疾病,手術(shù)治療已成為難治性癲癇的重要治療手段,而準(zhǔn)確的癲癇病灶定位是手術(shù)成功與否的關(guān)鍵。術(shù)中皮層腦電圖(Electrocorticogram,ECoG)監(jiān)測(cè)是癲癇病灶定位的重要手段之一,而其在術(shù)中受很多麻醉藥(特別是吸入麻醉藥)的影響,因此,合理選擇麻醉藥及確定用量是快速監(jiān)測(cè)病灶的關(guān)鍵所在[1-2]。近年來,高選擇性α2受體激動(dòng)劑右美托咪定(Dexmedetomidine,DEX)在功能神經(jīng)外科手術(shù)的作用成為研究熱點(diǎn)[3-4]。前期研究在ECoG監(jiān)測(cè)下行癲癇病灶切除術(shù)中,采用DEX輔助下復(fù)合得普利麻和瑞芬太尼全憑靜脈麻醉,結(jié)果顯示,復(fù)合DEX對(duì)術(shù)中腦電圖影響較小,同時(shí)其抗交感作用對(duì)麻醉誘導(dǎo)氣管插管和蘇醒期拔管時(shí)血液動(dòng)力學(xué)的波動(dòng)起到了穩(wěn)定作用,并且減少了全麻恢復(fù)期寒戰(zhàn)、譫妄等不良反應(yīng),為臨床癲癇患者手術(shù)麻醉提供了較好的麻醉方式[5]。本研究觀察不同劑量DEX在皮層腦電圖監(jiān)測(cè)下行癲癇病灶切除術(shù)中對(duì)腦功能區(qū)域定位及麻醉蘇醒期的影響,旨在探討用于癲癇外科手術(shù)麻醉適宜的DEX劑量。
1.1 一般資料 選擇2012年2月至2014年5月在我院神經(jīng)外科住院、因頑固性癲癇擇期開顱行病灶切除術(shù)的患者,共80例,其中男46例,女34例,年齡18~55歲,體重45~75 kg,ASAⅠ~Ⅱ級(jí)。術(shù)前經(jīng)腦電圖、MRI確診,因長(zhǎng)期、系統(tǒng)服用抗癲癇藥物均不能有效控制癲癇發(fā)作入院。80例患者隨機(jī)分成4組:右美托咪定1組(D1組)、右美托咪定2組(D2組)、右美托咪定3組(D3組)和生理鹽水對(duì)照組(NS組),每組20例。
1.2 麻醉方法 術(shù)前所有患者均不使用鎮(zhèn)靜藥物,抗癲癇藥物可服用至手術(shù)當(dāng)日。入室后連接監(jiān)護(hù)儀常規(guī)監(jiān)測(cè)血壓(MAP)、心率(HR)、心電圖(ECG)和脈搏血氧飽和度(SpO2)。橈動(dòng)脈穿刺直接動(dòng)脈測(cè)壓。DEX組麻醉誘導(dǎo)前均輸注負(fù)荷量右美托咪定(規(guī)格:2 mL∶200 μg,批號(hào):15082132,江蘇恒瑞醫(yī)藥股份有限公司)0.4 μg/kg(輸注時(shí)間10 min),之后D1、D2和D3組分別持續(xù)泵注右美托咪定0.2、0.3、0.4 μg/(kg·h),直至病灶切除硬腦膜縫合結(jié)束;NS組予等量生理鹽水。四組患者均采用舒芬太尼0.3 μg/kg、得普利麻TCI血藥濃度4.5 μg/mL、羅庫溴胺0.8 mg/kg全麻誘導(dǎo),氣管插管,維持PETCO2為28~32 mmHg。得普利麻靶控輸注2.0~2.5 μg/mL,瑞芬太尼3~6 μg/(kg·h)靜脈輸注,順苯磺阿曲庫胺0.5 mg/kg單次靜脈注射維持麻醉。切開硬腦膜時(shí)停止瑞芬太尼輸注。行ECoG監(jiān)測(cè)前將得普利麻靶濃度設(shè)為1.6 μg/mL,ECoG監(jiān)測(cè)完成后各藥物恢復(fù)之前維持劑量。手術(shù)結(jié)束后,停用所有藥物,待患者自主呼吸恢復(fù)、吞咽嗆咳反射恢復(fù),拔除氣管導(dǎo)管,送入麻醉恢復(fù)室。
1.3 觀察指標(biāo)
1.3.1 記錄各組患者麻醉前(T0)、插管前(負(fù)荷量輸注完畢,T1)、插管即刻(T2)、切皮(T3)、拔管(T4)各時(shí)間點(diǎn)的MAP和HR。
1.3.2 記錄蘇醒時(shí)間(縫皮完畢停藥至患者蘇醒)、拔管時(shí)間(停藥至拔出氣管導(dǎo)管時(shí)間)及圍術(shù)期不良反應(yīng)(拔管劇烈嗆咳,躁動(dòng),惡心嘔吐,呼吸抑制,術(shù)中知曉)的發(fā)生例數(shù)。
1.3.3 ECoG監(jiān)測(cè) 術(shù)中開始進(jìn)行ECoG監(jiān)測(cè)時(shí),選擇基線穩(wěn)定、無干擾的10 s描記圖,由專業(yè)的腦電生理專家計(jì)算各腦電波形的頻率和波幅;記錄術(shù)中調(diào)節(jié)得普利麻靶濃度至ECoG出現(xiàn)明確棘波所需時(shí)間(調(diào)整時(shí)間)以及監(jiān)測(cè)過程中爆發(fā)抑制發(fā)生例數(shù)。
2.1 患者一般情況比較 各組患者性別比例、年齡、體重、病灶部位及手術(shù)時(shí)間比較差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05),見表1。
2.2 血流動(dòng)力學(xué)比較 各組T0~T3時(shí)MAP比較差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05);T4時(shí),DEX組MAP低于NS組(P<0.05)。輸注完畢負(fù)荷劑量右美托咪定10 min后,DEX組患者插管前HR較入室基礎(chǔ)值降低(P<0.05);T2時(shí),DEX組HR低于NS組(P<0.05),而NS組HR較入室時(shí)升高(P<0.05);拔管時(shí),DEX組HR低于NS組(P<0.05),但各DEX組間MAP和HR比較差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05),見表2。
表1 各組患者一般資料及手術(shù)時(shí)間比較(例)
表2 各組不同時(shí)間點(diǎn)MAP、HR比較
注:*與T0時(shí)比較,P<0.05;#與NS組比較,P<0.05
2.3 蘇醒時(shí)間、拔管時(shí)間及圍術(shù)期不良反應(yīng) D3組患者蘇醒時(shí)間、拔管時(shí)間與NS組、D1組和D2組比較差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05),D1組和D2組與NS組比較、D1組與D2組比較差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。D3組患者拔管劇烈嗆咳和躁動(dòng)發(fā)生例數(shù)較NS組明顯減少(P<0.05),D2組患者躁動(dòng)發(fā)生例數(shù)較NS組明顯減少(P<0.05),各組均未發(fā)生呼吸抑制和術(shù)中知曉,見表3、表4。
2.4 神經(jīng)電生理學(xué)資料分析及藥物調(diào)整時(shí)間 術(shù)前NREM睡眠時(shí)相EEG監(jiān)測(cè)顯示,各組患者棘波、背景波的頻率和波幅大小比較差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05);術(shù)中ECoG監(jiān)測(cè)顯示,各組患者棘波頻率和波幅比較差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義;DEX組背景波頻率和波幅較NS組略有下降,但差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。各組爆發(fā)抑制發(fā)生例數(shù)比較差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05),對(duì)照組調(diào)整時(shí)間較DEX組延長(zhǎng)(P<0.05),見表5。
表3 各組患者蘇醒、拔管時(shí)間比較(min)
注:△與NS組、D1組和D2組比較,P<0.05
表4 各組圍術(shù)期不良反應(yīng)(例,%)
注:*與NS組比較,P<0.05
表5 各組神經(jīng)電生理學(xué)資料
注:*與NS組比較,P<0.05
由于吸入麻醉藥對(duì)皮層腦電圖的影響較大,所以功能神經(jīng)外科手術(shù)麻醉基本以靜脈麻醉為主,但許多靜脈麻醉藥物隨濃度的改變也能引起EEG頻率、波幅和波形的改變[6-7]。氯胺酮有明顯的抗癲癇作用,不能用于癲癇手術(shù)[8]。有研究表明,依托咪酯應(yīng)用于非癲癇患者不會(huì)產(chǎn)生異常腦電圖和癥狀,但也有報(bào)道認(rèn)為部分患者會(huì)出現(xiàn)神經(jīng)興奮癥狀。關(guān)于丙泊酚對(duì)癲癇患者腦電圖的影響,有研究顯示,丙泊酚無抗驚厥作用,可誘發(fā)異常放電,激發(fā)癲癇棘波;也有研究者認(rèn)為,其對(duì)癲癇棘波的影響不大[9]。筆者前期研究結(jié)果表明,丙泊酚2.0~2.5 μg/mL的臨床劑量對(duì)皮層腦電圖基本沒有影響,而為了保證一定麻醉深度和患者的舒適及循環(huán)的穩(wěn)定,在靜脈麻醉基礎(chǔ)上應(yīng)用右美托咪定作為麻醉輔助用藥,取得了滿意的效果。但該研究對(duì)其藥物劑量選擇只是做了初步探討。本研究選用三組不同濃度的右美托咪定劑量,觀察其對(duì)皮層腦電圖及麻醉蘇醒期的影響,進(jìn)一步探討右美托咪定的劑量效應(yīng)及較為合理的用藥劑量。
右美托咪定是新型的α2受體激動(dòng)劑,作用于大腦皮層下區(qū)域,不同于其他全麻藥,作用于GABA(Gamma-aminobutyric acid)系統(tǒng),不干擾大腦正常電脈沖活動(dòng),不損害認(rèn)知功能(GABA系統(tǒng)與認(rèn)知功能及干擾腦電活動(dòng)有關(guān))[10-11]。不同部位的α2腎上腺素能受體具有不同的生理學(xué)作用,激動(dòng)腦干藍(lán)斑核上α2腎上腺素能受體,發(fā)揮鎮(zhèn)靜、催眠和抗焦慮效應(yīng)。右美托咪定對(duì)α2受體的選擇性(α2∶α1=1 620∶1)是同類藥物可樂定(α2∶α1=220∶1)的8倍,避免α1受體激動(dòng)帶來的不良反應(yīng),被臨床視為單純?chǔ)?腎上腺素能受體激動(dòng)劑,具有廣闊的應(yīng)用前景。另外,有報(bào)道,右美托咪定與其他鎮(zhèn)靜藥物不同,主要作用部位在腦干藍(lán)斑核,可產(chǎn)生一種與自然睡眠相似的鎮(zhèn)靜狀態(tài)[12-14]?;诖死碚?,筆者前期研究選擇右美托咪定復(fù)合丙泊酚及瑞芬太尼用于功能性神經(jīng)外科手術(shù)癲癇病灶切除術(shù)中,結(jié)果顯示,其不僅能滿足術(shù)中監(jiān)測(cè)腦電圖對(duì)臨床麻醉的特殊要求,還能保證患者整個(gè)手術(shù)中血液動(dòng)力學(xué)的平穩(wěn),并減少術(shù)后躁動(dòng)等不良反應(yīng)的發(fā)生。
本研究中,術(shù)中腦電監(jiān)測(cè)探測(cè)癲癇病灶時(shí),采用0.2、0.3、0.4 μg/(kg·h)右美托咪定,而麻醉誘導(dǎo)及術(shù)中維持時(shí),其他藥物濃度、用量保持一致,結(jié)果顯示,插管即刻、拔管時(shí),DEX組HR低于NS組,手術(shù)結(jié)束拔除氣管導(dǎo)管時(shí),DEX組MAP低于NS組,表明3個(gè)劑量右美托咪定對(duì)麻醉誘導(dǎo)氣管插管及麻醉蘇醒拔管時(shí)的應(yīng)激反應(yīng)均有一定的抑制作用。D3組患者蘇醒時(shí)間較NS組、D1組和D2組延長(zhǎng),拔管時(shí)間較NS組延長(zhǎng),但D1組、D2組患者的蘇醒時(shí)間和拔管時(shí)間與NS組比較、D1組與D2組比較差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義;D3組拔管劇烈嗆咳和躁動(dòng)發(fā)生例數(shù)較NS組減少,D2組患者躁動(dòng)發(fā)生例數(shù)較NS組減少,各組均未發(fā)生呼吸抑制和術(shù)中知曉;術(shù)中ECoG監(jiān)測(cè)各組患者棘波頻率和波幅無顯著差異;各組患者的爆發(fā)抑制發(fā)生例數(shù)比較差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義;對(duì)照組調(diào)整時(shí)間較DEX組延長(zhǎng)。結(jié)果表明,右美托咪定3種劑量用藥不影響術(shù)中ECoG監(jiān)測(cè),可加快監(jiān)測(cè)到有效腦電棘波的調(diào)整時(shí)間,對(duì)術(shù)后蘇醒期躁動(dòng)有一定控制作用。0.2 μg/(kg·h)劑量能滿足對(duì)術(shù)中腦電圖監(jiān)測(cè)無影響,但對(duì)麻醉誘導(dǎo)及蘇醒期應(yīng)激反應(yīng)引起的循環(huán)波動(dòng)抑制作用較弱;0.4 μg/(kg·h)對(duì)術(shù)中腦電圖監(jiān)測(cè)無影響,同時(shí)對(duì)麻醉誘導(dǎo)及蘇醒期應(yīng)激反應(yīng)引起的循環(huán)波動(dòng)具有很好的抑制作用,但對(duì)蘇醒時(shí)間的影響較大,使拔管、蘇醒時(shí)間延長(zhǎng),影響術(shù)者對(duì)患者進(jìn)行手術(shù)效果的評(píng)估,引起家屬擔(dān)憂;而D2組0.3 μg/(kg·h)劑量不僅對(duì)麻醉誘導(dǎo)氣管插管及麻醉蘇醒拔管時(shí)的應(yīng)激反應(yīng)有一定的抑制作用,對(duì)蘇醒期躁動(dòng)有較好的抑制作用,而且不延長(zhǎng)蘇醒時(shí)間,表明應(yīng)用右美托咪定0.3 μg/(kg·h)持續(xù)輸注是開顱癲癇病灶切除腦電圖定位手術(shù)的適宜劑量。
本研究中選用的3種右美托咪定劑量均在臨床用量范圍內(nèi),可安全有效地用于術(shù)中腦電監(jiān)測(cè)探測(cè)癲癇病灶的手術(shù)中,但以0.3 g/(kg·h)劑量的效果最好,其對(duì)術(shù)中ECoG監(jiān)測(cè)不產(chǎn)生影響,且調(diào)整時(shí)間短,同時(shí),可維持患者的血液動(dòng)力學(xué)穩(wěn)定,保證安全舒適的麻醉蘇醒期。此外,以右美托咪定作為麻醉輔助用藥可以減少靜脈麻醉藥用量,且其抗交感神經(jīng)作用維持了麻醉誘導(dǎo)及蘇醒拔管期的血液動(dòng)力學(xué)穩(wěn)定,對(duì)呼吸抑制沒有影響,適合作為輔助用藥應(yīng)用于功能神經(jīng)外科手術(shù)麻醉中。Talke等[8]研究顯示,輸注右美托咪定不減少癲癇病灶的發(fā)作活動(dòng),對(duì)癲癇病灶切除手術(shù),可能是一種較為合適的麻醉輔助用藥,與本研究結(jié)果一致。有報(bào)道,使用右美托咪定不會(huì)干擾腦電生理監(jiān)測(cè)[15]。本研究表明,右美托咪定0.2、0.3、0.4 μg/(kg·h)復(fù)合小劑量丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼,對(duì)術(shù)中腦電監(jiān)測(cè)均沒有明顯的影響,對(duì)手術(shù)麻醉較強(qiáng)的應(yīng)激反應(yīng)有一定的抑制作用,可維持血液動(dòng)力學(xué)的平穩(wěn),同時(shí)對(duì)麻醉蘇醒期的躁動(dòng)有一定抑制作用,無呼吸抑制和術(shù)中知曉病例。其中,0.4 μg/(kg·h)組蘇醒時(shí)間延長(zhǎng),在可控允許范圍內(nèi)。因此,采用右美托咪定0.2、0.3、0.4 μg/(kg·h)復(fù)合丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼,對(duì)術(shù)中腦電監(jiān)測(cè)下切除癲癇病灶手術(shù)麻醉安全有效,其中以0.3 μg/(kg·h)組最為適宜。
右美托咪定通過興奮腦干藍(lán)斑核內(nèi)的α2腎上腺受體,產(chǎn)生劑量依賴性的獨(dú)特的鎮(zhèn)靜、催眠和抗焦慮作用,且能減少腦灌注量,降低腦代謝[16];此外,有研究表明,右美托咪定在動(dòng)物腦缺血模型、局部腦缺血模型和缺血腦損傷模型中有神經(jīng)保護(hù)作用[17],而在癲癇病灶切除術(shù)中應(yīng)用右美托咪定是否具有神經(jīng)保護(hù)作用以及可能的機(jī)制有待于進(jìn)一步探討。
[1]李云林,欒國(guó)明.功能區(qū)難治性癲癇的外科治療進(jìn)展[J].現(xiàn)代神經(jīng)疾病雜志,2002,2(4):237-239.
[2]蔡立新,李勇杰.術(shù)中皮層腦電圖監(jiān)測(cè)在癲癇外科中的應(yīng)用[J].立體定向和功能性神經(jīng)外科雜志,2007,2(4):306-309.
[3]Martin E,Ramsay G,Mantz J,et al.The role of the α2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine in postsurgical sedation in the intensive care unit[J].Intensive Care Med,2003,18:29-41.
[4]Wang Y,Han R,Zuo Z.Dexmedetomidine post-treatment induces neuroprotection via activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase in rats with subarachnoid haemorrhage[J].Br J Anaesth,2016,116(3):384-392.
[5]沈潔,吳輝輝.右美托咪定在皮層腦電圖監(jiān)測(cè)下癲癇病灶切除術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J].實(shí)用藥物與臨床,2015,18(8):915-919.
[6]田肇隆,許亞超,王天龍.癲癇外科手術(shù)麻醉進(jìn)展[J].中國(guó)現(xiàn)代神經(jīng)疾病雜志,2010,10(4):426-429.
[7]Mason KP,O′Mahony E,Zurakowski D,et al.Effects of dexmedetomidine sedation on the EEG in children[J].Paediatr Anaesth,2009,19(12):1175-1183.
[8]Talke P,Stapelfeldt C,Garcia P.Dexmedetomidine does not reduce epileptiform discharges in adults with epilepsy[J].Neurosurg Anesthesiol,2007,19(3):195-199.
[9]張國(guó)華,孫莉.不同阿片類藥物對(duì)意識(shí)消失時(shí)異丙酚用量及大腦皮質(zhì)抑制速度和抑制程度的影響[J].醫(yī)學(xué)研究雜志,2015,44(3):63-67.
[10]Rozet I.Anesthesia for functional neurosurgery:the role of dexmedetomidine[J].Curr Opin Anaesthesiol,2008,21(5):537-543.
[11]林振華,程明華,莊少惠.術(shù)前焦慮患者術(shù)中應(yīng)用右美托咪定的鎮(zhèn)靜效果[J].中國(guó)醫(yī)藥,2016,11(4):564-568.
[12]Souter MJ,Rozet I,Ojemonn JG,et al.Dexmedetomidine sedation during awake craniotomy for seizure resection:effects on electrocorgraphy[J].J Neurosurg Anesthesiol,2007,19:38-44.
[13]張清,陳永強(qiáng).右美托咪定的臨床應(yīng)用進(jìn)展[J].醫(yī)學(xué)綜述,2011,3(17):434-437.
[14]趙娟,鄭麗宏.右美托咪定在臨床麻醉中的作用優(yōu)勢(shì)[J].實(shí)用醫(yī)學(xué)雜志,2015,31(8):1355-1357.
[15]李民,張利萍,吳新民.右美托咪定在臨床麻醉中應(yīng)用的研究進(jìn)展[J].中國(guó)臨床藥理學(xué)雜志,2007,23(6):466-470.
[16]伍佳莉,蘇松,周淑敏,等.異丙酚減輕氯胺酮麻醉對(duì)幼年大鼠海馬神經(jīng)元和認(rèn)知功能的損害[J].中國(guó)現(xiàn)代醫(yī)學(xué)雜志,2015,25(6):1-7.
[17]Rajan S,Hutcherson MT,Sessler DI,et al.The effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on hemodynamic stability and analgesic requirement after craniotomy:a randomized controlled trial[J].J Neurosurg Anesthesiol,2015,28(8):758-763.
Clinical study on different dosage of dexmedetomidine in the anesthetic management of epilepsy resection under electrocorticography monitoring
SHEN Jie1*,JI Yong2,JIN Qiu3,WU Hui-hui4
(1.Department of Anesthesiology,Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University,Shenyang 110004,China; 2.First People′s Hospital of Jining, Jining 272011, China; 3.Fushun Petrochemical General Hospital, Fushun 113006, China; 4.First People′s Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai 201600, China)
Objective To observe the effect of intravenous anesthesia with different dosage of dexmedetomidine(DEX) on brain mapping and anesthesia recovery period during epilepsy resection under electrocorticography monitoring.Methods Eighty obstinate epilepsy patients expected for operation were randomly divided into 4 groups:DEX groups (group D1,group D2and group D3) and control group (group NS).In DEX groups,a loading dose of 0.4 μg/kg DEX was slowly injected within 10 min,followed by 0.2,0.3 and 0.4 μg/(kg·h) DEX for D1,D2and D3,respectively,which was maintained until the incision of epilepsy foci.Group NS was given 0.9% normal saline.The anesthesia was induced with sufentanyl,propofol and rocuronium and maintained with target controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol 2.0~2.5 μg/mL,remifentanil 3~6 μg/(kg·h) and cisatracurium 0.5 mg/kg.Remifentanil was stopped when the dura mater was cut,and the target concentration of propofol was set at 1.6 μg/mL before electrocorticogram (ECoG) was monitored.All the concentrations of drugs were recovered after ECoG was monitored.All the drugs were stopped after operation,and the patients were sent to the awake room when the life sign was stable.The MAP and HR were continuously recorded at the time points of intubation,skin incision and extubation.The awake time,time of extubation and the number of adverse reactions were recorded.The 10 s scanning maps without interference were chosen to calculate the frequency and amplitude of spine by electrophysiology experts.The time of location of epilepsy loci and the number of burst suppression were recorded.Results Compared with group NS,the HR in group DEX was lower (P<0.05) at the time points of intubation and extubation,and the MAP was lower at extubation (P<0.05).The awake time and extubation time in group D3was longer than those of the other groups (P<0.05).There was no significant difference between group D1(or group D2) and group NS (P>0.05) or between group D1and group D2(P>0.05).Compared with group NS,the incidence of severe cough and agitation in group D3and agitation in group D2were lower (P<0.05).No respiratory depression and intraoperative awareness was observed.There was no significant difference in the frequency and amplitude of spine among the groups,and the setting-up time in group NS was longer than that of group DEX(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the number of patients with burst suppression was found among the groups (P>0.05).Conclusion Dexmedetomidine of 0.2,0.3 and 0.4 μg/(kg·h)combined with remifentanil and propofol is effective and safe in the anesthesia in epilepsy resection under electrocorticography monitoring,and the effect is best when the concentration of dexmedetomidine is 0.3 μg/(kg·h).
Dexmedetomidine;Epilepsy;Electrocorticography;Total intravenous anesthesia
2016-07-13
1.中國(guó)醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬盛京醫(yī)院麻醉科,沈陽110004;2.濟(jì)寧市第一人民醫(yī)院,山東 濟(jì)寧 272011;3.撫順市石化總醫(yī)院,遼寧 撫順113006;4.上海市第一人民醫(yī)院,上海 201600
遼寧省科學(xué)技術(shù)項(xiàng)目(2013225049)
10.14053/j.cnki.ppcr.201702012
*通信作者