陳慧君,黃亦波,林蓉蓉,鄭飛云
1.溫州醫(yī)科大學(xué) 第一臨床醫(yī)學(xué)院,浙江 溫州 325035;2.溫州醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬第一醫(yī)院 婦科,浙江溫州 325015)
·論 著·
IB~I(xiàn) IB期宮頸癌盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移相關(guān)因素分析
陳慧君1,黃亦波1,林蓉蓉1,鄭飛云2
1.溫州醫(yī)科大學(xué) 第一臨床醫(yī)學(xué)院,浙江 溫州 325035;2.溫州醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬第一醫(yī)院 婦科,浙江溫州 325015)
目的:分析IB~I(xiàn) IB期宮頸癌盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移情況及相關(guān)高危因素,為早期宮頸癌的手術(shù)方式提供參考。方法:對(duì)158例進(jìn)行廣泛性全子宮切除術(shù)聯(lián)合盆腔淋巴結(jié)清掃的IB~I(xiàn) IB期宮頸癌患者的臨床病理資料進(jìn)行回顧性分析,對(duì)影響淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移的因素采用logistic回歸分析。結(jié)果:158例IB~I(xiàn) IB期宮頸癌有36例淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移陽(yáng)性,轉(zhuǎn)移率為22.8%,其中閉孔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移22例(占13.9%),髂內(nèi)淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移15例(占9.5%),髂外淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移10例(占6.3%),髂總淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移7例(占4.4%),腹股溝深淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移4例(占2.5%),宮旁淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移1例(占0.6%),腹主動(dòng)脈旁淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移1例(占0.6%)。21例孤立淋巴結(jié)陽(yáng)性,15例多組淋巴結(jié)陽(yáng)性。單因素分析結(jié)果顯示腫瘤直徑大小超過(guò)4 cm,術(shù)前鱗狀細(xì)胞癌抗原(SCC-Ag)及宮旁浸潤(rùn)與盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移相關(guān)(P<0.05)。logistic回歸分析結(jié)果顯示腫瘤直徑超過(guò)4 cm及宮旁浸潤(rùn)是盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移的獨(dú)立危險(xiǎn)因素(P<0.05)。結(jié)論:IB~I(xiàn) IB期宮頸癌盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)以閉孔淋巴結(jié)最易受累,腫瘤直徑超過(guò)4 cm及宮旁浸潤(rùn)是盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移的高危因素。
宮頸腫瘤;盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移;腫瘤大?。粚m旁浸潤(rùn);回歸分析
盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移是影響宮頸癌患者生存及預(yù)后的重要因素。但是早期宮頸癌淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移率低[1-2],且廣泛全子宮切除術(shù)聯(lián)合盆腔淋巴清掃術(shù)后并發(fā)癥較多[3-4],嚴(yán)重影響患者術(shù)后生活質(zhì)量。國(guó)外研究報(bào)道[5-8]對(duì)早期宮頸癌實(shí)施根治性全子宮切除術(shù)聯(lián)合盆腔淋巴清掃術(shù)存在一定爭(zhēng)議。本研究通過(guò)回顧性分析IB~I(xiàn)IB期宮頸癌盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移情況,探討宮頸癌淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移的特征及其相關(guān)臨床病理因素,為早期宮頸癌患者的個(gè)體化治療提供參考。
1.1 一般資料 選取2012年5月至2014年5月我院
1.2 方法 ①所有患者均實(shí)施廣泛性子宮全切除術(shù)聯(lián)合盆腔淋巴清掃術(shù),術(shù)前均未實(shí)施放化療等輔助治療,根據(jù)術(shù)后病理結(jié)果,對(duì)有淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移陽(yáng)性、脈管浸潤(rùn)陽(yáng)性、手術(shù)切緣陽(yáng)性者予輔以體外放療或化療,術(shù)后予門診、電話等方式積極隨訪。②通過(guò)回顧性分析方法,采用單因素分析比較盆腔淋巴結(jié)陰性與陽(yáng)性患者相關(guān)臨床病理因素,包括年齡、分期、是否絕經(jīng)、孕次、產(chǎn)次、陰道穹窿受累與否、腫瘤大小、腫瘤生長(zhǎng)方式、術(shù)前鱗狀細(xì)胞癌抗原(SCC-Ag)水平和分化程度、病理類型,并對(duì)差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)的變量采用logistic回歸分析,探討早期宮頸癌淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移的獨(dú)立危險(xiǎn)因素。1.3 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)處理方法 采用SPSS 19.0統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)軟件。計(jì)數(shù)資料以百分率表示。單因素分析采用卡方檢驗(yàn)。多因素分析采用logistic回歸分析,用前進(jìn)法(α=0.05)進(jìn)行變量篩選。P<0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2.1 盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移情況 158例IB~I(xiàn)IB期宮頸癌有36例盆腔淋巴結(jié)陽(yáng)性,淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移率為22.8% (36/158),其中閉孔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移22例(占13.9%),髂內(nèi)淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移15例(占9.5%),髂外淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移10例(占6.3%),髂總淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移7例(占4.4%),腹股溝深淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移4例(占2.5%),宮旁淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移1例(占0.6%),腹主動(dòng)脈旁淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移1例(占0.6%)。孤立淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移22例,多組淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移14例。
2.2 盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移單因素分析 結(jié)果顯示腫瘤直徑超過(guò)4 cm、術(shù)前SCC-Ag水平及宮旁浸潤(rùn)與盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移相關(guān)(P<0.05),而與患者年齡、分期、是否絕經(jīng)、孕次、產(chǎn)次、陰道穹窿是否受累、腫瘤生長(zhǎng)方式、分化程度及病理分型無(wú)關(guān)(P>0.05)。見(jiàn)表1。
2.3 盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移logistic回歸分析 結(jié)果顯示術(shù)前SCC-Ag水平>4 μg/L與盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移的關(guān)系差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05);而腫瘤直徑≥4 cm及宮旁浸潤(rùn)陽(yáng)性是盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移的獨(dú)立危險(xiǎn)因素(P<0.05)。見(jiàn)表2。
表1 盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移單因素分析結(jié)果
表2 盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移多因素logistic回歸分析
宮頸癌擴(kuò)散的主要方式是直接蔓延和盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移,而盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移是宮頸癌擴(kuò)散的主要轉(zhuǎn)移途徑,是影響宮頸癌患者生存及預(yù)后的重要因素[9-11]。報(bào)道認(rèn)為早期宮頸浸潤(rùn)癌的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)治療方式是廣泛子宮切除聯(lián)合盆腔淋巴清掃術(shù)[12],但術(shù)后并發(fā)癥較多,如失血、輸血、腸梗阻、神經(jīng)血管損傷、淋巴水腫、淋巴囊腫等[3-4,13-14]。并且早期宮頸癌淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移率低[1-2],為減少盆腔淋巴清掃術(shù)后并發(fā)癥,現(xiàn)在有不少國(guó)外研究[5-7]主張?jiān)缙趯m頸浸潤(rùn)癌實(shí)施保守手術(shù),如單純子宮切除術(shù)等。因此如何準(zhǔn)確地判定早期宮頸癌盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移情況,選定合理的手術(shù)范圍,是否可避免盆腔淋巴清掃,以提高患者生存和生活質(zhì)量值得探討。
本研究回顧性分析158例宮頸癌淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移情況,以閉孔淋巴結(jié)最易受累,單因素分析結(jié)果提示腫瘤直徑超過(guò)4 cm、術(shù)前SCC-Ag及宮旁浸潤(rùn)與淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移相關(guān),而logistic回歸分析結(jié)果顯示腫瘤直徑大小超過(guò)4 cm及宮旁浸潤(rùn)是淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移的高危因素。IB、IIA、IIB期宮頸癌盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移率分別為20.2%(19/94)、24.6%(14/57)、42.9%(3/7),結(jié)果顯示淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移率有隨著宮頸癌期別增高而增高趨勢(shì),但差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,說(shuō)明臨床分期與盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移是否相關(guān)仍需大樣本的臨床資料去證實(shí)。
Togami等[15]研究了163例IA2~I(xiàn) IB期宮頸癌盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移情況,結(jié)果顯示IA2、IB1、IB2、I IA、IIB期宮頸癌盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移率分別為0%(0/12)、17%(13/76)、22%(6/27)、33%(8/24)、63%(15/24),隨訪研究發(fā)現(xiàn)盆腔淋巴結(jié)陰性和陽(yáng)性患者中,5年無(wú)復(fù)發(fā)率分別為92%和46%,5年生存率分別為94% 和61%,證實(shí)了盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移是宮頸癌患者生存、復(fù)發(fā)的獨(dú)立因素。有研究[16]表明宮頸癌治療前SCC-Ag水平為4μ g/L是判斷淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移高風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的理想界值,而本研究單因素分析也顯示術(shù)前SCC-Ag>4μ g/L與盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移密切相關(guān)。
Turan等[17]研究認(rèn)為早期宮頸癌腫瘤直徑大小與盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移相關(guān),且腫瘤大小超過(guò)4 cm與淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移顯著相關(guān),是宮頸癌淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移的獨(dú)立危險(xiǎn)因素之一。而Togami等[15]也認(rèn)同宮頸癌盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移與腫瘤大小密切相關(guān),但腫瘤直徑超過(guò)2 cm已是盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移的危險(xiǎn)因素。因臨床上確切的測(cè)量腫瘤體積存在難度,故常以腫瘤直徑大小來(lái)表示。本研究單因素分析和logistic回歸分析結(jié)果均顯示腫瘤直徑超過(guò)4 cm是盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移的獨(dú)立危險(xiǎn)因素。
李洋[18]對(duì)142例IA~I(xiàn)IB期宮頸癌進(jìn)行研究,認(rèn)為腫瘤大小超過(guò)4 cm、深度浸潤(rùn)、脈管浸潤(rùn)及宮旁浸潤(rùn)是淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移的高危因素。萬(wàn)磊等[19]采用多因素分析發(fā)現(xiàn)間質(zhì)浸潤(rùn)、淋巴血管浸潤(rùn)、腫瘤直徑與淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移密切相關(guān)。Takeda等[16]認(rèn)為SCC與CA125聯(lián)合預(yù)測(cè)淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移有重要意義,且淋巴血管浸潤(rùn)是宮頸癌患者預(yù)后不良的獨(dú)立影響因素。許多研究[7,20-22]采用單因素、多因素分析均提示淋巴血管浸潤(rùn)與淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移呈正相關(guān)??紤]到早期宮頸癌術(shù)前不能很準(zhǔn)確地預(yù)估是否有脈管浸潤(rùn),本研究并沒(méi)有將脈管浸潤(rùn)納入單因素分析。
早期宮頸癌盆腔前哨淋巴結(jié)及轉(zhuǎn)移的前哨淋巴結(jié)位置集中于宮旁、閉孔淋巴結(jié)[23],本研究也顯示早期宮頸癌淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移患者中,閉孔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移構(gòu)成比占61.1%,與研究報(bào)道一致。前哨淋巴結(jié)檢測(cè)已被廣泛應(yīng)用于描述宮頸癌淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移的情況[23-24]。Altgassen等[25]研究發(fā)現(xiàn)宮頸癌腫瘤直徑小于2 cm時(shí),前哨淋巴結(jié)檢測(cè)的敏感性高達(dá)94.3%,而腫瘤直徑大于2 cm時(shí),敏感性則只有88.5%,認(rèn)為宮頸癌腫瘤直徑小于2 cm時(shí)前哨淋巴結(jié)檢測(cè)敏感性較高。而Cormier等[1]報(bào)道顯示在早期宮頸癌中前哨淋巴結(jié)的敏感性高達(dá)93%。Eiriksson等[26]認(rèn)為前哨淋巴結(jié)陰性者可避免盆腔淋巴結(jié)清掃。因此前哨淋巴結(jié)檢測(cè)是否能取代盆腔淋巴結(jié)清掃仍需多中心的、大量的樣本去證實(shí)。
綜上所述,本研究認(rèn)為IB~I(xiàn)IB期宮頸癌盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移與腫瘤大小及宮旁浸潤(rùn)密切相關(guān),當(dāng)宮頸癌患者存在上述盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移高危因素時(shí),應(yīng)積極治療,改善預(yù)后,當(dāng)腫瘤小于4 cm且宮旁浸潤(rùn)陰性時(shí),應(yīng)術(shù)前準(zhǔn)確評(píng)估,為制定早期宮頸癌個(gè)體化治療方案。本研究為回顧性分析研究,納入病例數(shù)較少,可能存在數(shù)據(jù)分析的偏倚,有待于擴(kuò)大樣本進(jìn)一步進(jìn)行前瞻性研究。
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1] Cormier B,Diaz JP,Shih K,et al.Establishing a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm for the treatment of early cervical cancer[J].Gynecol Oncol,2011,122(2):275-280.
[2] Roy M,Bouchard-Fortier G,Popa I,et al.Value of sentinel node mapping in cancer of the cervix[J].Gynecol Oncol,2011,122(2):269-274.
[3] Bergmark K,Avall-Lundqvist E,Dickman PW,et al.Lymphedema and bladder-emptying difficulties after radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer and among population controls[J].Int J Gynecol Cancer,2006,16(3):1130-1139.
[4] Tada H,Teramukai S,Fukushima M,et al.Risk factors for lower limb lymphedema after lymph node dissection in patients with ovarian and uterine carcinoma[J].BMC Cancer,2009,9(47):1-6.
[5] Frumovitz M,Sun CC,Schmeler KM,et al.Parametrial involvement in radical hysterectomy specimens for women with early-stage cervical cancer[J].Obstet Gynecol,2009,114(1):93-102.
[6] Kodama J,Kusumoto T,Nakamura K,et al.Factors associated with parametrial involvement in stage IB1 cervical cancer and identification of patients suitable for less radical surgery[J].Gynecol Oncol,2011,122(3):491-494.
[7] Murakami I,Fujii T,Kameyama K,et al.Tumor volume and lymphovascular space invasion as a prognostic factor in early invasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix[J].J Gynecol Oncol,2012,23(3):153-158.
[8] Meirovitz M,Sade S,Dreiher J,et al.Is radical hysterectomy necessary in early cervical cancer?[J].Gynecol Obstet Invest,2013,76(3):158-162.
[9] Hosaka M,Watari H,Mitamura T,et al.Survival and prognosticators of node-positive cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy [J].Int J Clin Oncol,2011,16(1):33-38.
[10] Kasamatsu T,Onda T,Sawada M,et al.Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I-IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix [J].Br J Cancer,2009,100(9):1400-1405.
[11] Lee J,Song Y,Soh EY.Prognostic significance of th number of metastatic lymph nodes to stratify the risk of recurrence[J].World J Surg,2014,38(4):858-862.
[12] Sakuragi N.Up-to-date management of lymph node metastasis and the role of tailored lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer[J].Int J Clin Oncol,2007,12(3):165-175.
[13] Pieterse QD,Maas CP,Ter Kuile MM,et al.An observational longitudinal study to evaluate miction,defecation,and sexual function after radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early-stage cervical cancer[J].Int J Gynecol Cancer,2006,16(3):1119-1129.
[14] 陳映鶴,木海琦,何有華,等.婦產(chǎn)科手術(shù)致泌尿系統(tǒng)器官損傷的原因及防治[J].溫州醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào),2010,40(5):487-489.
[15] Togami S,Kamio M,Yanazume S,et al.Can pelvic lymphadenectomy be omitted in stage IA2 to Iib uterine cervical cancer?[J].Int J Gynecol Cancer,2014,24(6):1072-1076.
[16] Takeda M,Sakuragi N,Okamoto K,et al.Preoperative serum SCC,CA125,and CA19-9 levels and lymph node status in squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2002,81(5):451-457.
[17] Turan T,Yildirim BA,Tulunay G,et al.Prognostic effect of different cut-off values (20mm,30mm and 40mm) for clinical tumor size in Figo Stage IB cervical cancer[J].Surg Oncol,2010,19(2):106-113.
[18] 李洋.Ia~I(xiàn)Ib期宮頸癌盆腔淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移高危因素的臨床分析[J].中國(guó)婦幼保健,2013,28(22):3584-3586.
[19] 萬(wàn)磊,李隆玉,曾四元,等.宮頸鱗癌淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移的高危因素分析[J].中國(guó)婦幼保健,2014,29(4):528-529.
[20] Singh P,Tripcony L,Nicklin J,et al.Analysis of prognostic variables,development of predictive models,and stratification of risk groups in surgically treated FIGO early-stage (IA-IIA) carcinoma cervix[J].Int J Gynecol Cancer,2012,22(1):115-122.
[21] Khunamornpong S,Lekawanvijit S,Settakorn J,et al.Prognostic model in patients with early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix:a combination of invasive margin pathological characteristics and lymphovascular space invasion[J].Asian Pac J Cancer Prev,2013,14(11):6935-6940.
[22] Milam MR,Frumovitz M,dos Reis R,et al.Preoperative lymph-vascular space invasion is associated with nodal metastases in women with early-stage cervical ancer[J].Gynecol Oncol,2007,106(1):12-15.
[23] Diaz JP,Gemignani ML,Pandit-Taskar N,et al.Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of early-stage cervical carcinoma[J].Gynecol Oncol,2011,120(3):347-352.
[24] Martinez A,Mery E,Filleron T,et al.Accuracy of intraoperative pathological examination of SLN in cervical cancer[J].Gynecol Oncol,2013,130(3):525-529.
[25] Altgassen C,Hertel H,Brandstadt A,et al.Multicenter validation study of the sentinel lymph node concept in cervical cancer:ago study group[J].J Clin Oncol,2008,26(18):2943-2951.
[26] Eiriksson LR,Covens A.Sentinel lymph node mapping in cervical cancer:the future?[J].BJOG,2012,119(2):129-133.
(本文編輯:吳健敏)
Analysis of factors affecting lymph node metastasis in FIGO IB to IIB uterine cervical cancer
CHEN Hui-un1,HUANG Yibo1,LIN Rongrong1,ZHENG Feiyun1.
1.The First Clinical Medical College of Wenzhou Medical University,Wenzhou,325035; 2.Department of Gynecology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University,Wenzhou,325015
Objective:To analysis the factors affecting lymph node metastasis in stage IB1 to IIB uterine cervical cancer.Methods:A total of 158 patients with stage IB to IIB cervical carcinomas treated with radical hysterectomy and systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy were retrospectively analyzed.The logistic multivariate analysis was used to select independent high-risk factors.Results:Thirty-six (22.8%) patients had pelvic lymph node metastasis.Of 36 lymph node metastases,22 were in the obturator,15 in the internal iliac,10 in the external liac,7 in the common iliac,4 in the deep inguinal,1 in the parametrial iliac and 1 in the para aortic.Univariate analysis revealed that tumor size,preoperative SCC-Ag level and parametrial invasion were related to pelvic ymph node metastasis.Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor size greater than 4 cm and parametrial invasion were independently associated with nodal metastasis.Conclusion:The obturator lymph nodes are most frequenty involved in stage IB~I(xiàn)IB uterine cervical cancer.Tumor size greater than 4 cm and parametrial invasion are high-risk factors of pelvic lymph node metastasis.
uterine cervical neoplasms; pelvic lymph node metastasis; tumor size; parametrial invasion:egression analysis
R713.4;R73
A
10.3969/j.issn.2095-9400.2015.04.004
2014-08-31
浙江省自然科學(xué)基金資助項(xiàng)目(Y2090699)。
陳慧君(1990-),女,浙江蒼南人,碩士生。
鄭飛云,教授,Email:zfy5710@163.com。158例IB~I(xiàn) IB期宮頸癌患者為研究對(duì)象,臨床資料和病理資料均完整,手術(shù)方式均為廣泛性全子宮切除術(shù)聯(lián)合盆腔淋巴清掃術(shù)。年齡26~74歲,平均年齡(51.5±10.5)歲,按FIGO分期標(biāo)準(zhǔn),均為IB~I(xiàn) IB期,其中IB期94例,I IA期57例,I IB期7例。術(shù)后病理證實(shí)鱗癌136例,腺癌11例,其他11例。