劉曉楊

【摘要】在傳統(tǒng)及物性分析的基礎上，韓禮得提出了作格分析模式。不同于及物性分析關注過程是否延及其他實體，作格分析從一個新的角度去解釋小句，即過程是否由外部原因引起。通過對比分析及物性和作格性，本文總結了作格理論中的主要概念，以及兩者間的差異。盡管漢語不是典型的作格語言，但現代漢語中存在大量的作格結構,然而傳統(tǒng)的及物性分析不能對這些特殊結構做出恰當的解釋。因此，在相關作格理論的基礎上，本文從功能語法的角度重點分析了現代漢語中的作格結構。

【關鍵詞】作格；及物性；作格分析；作格結構；現代漢語

【Abstract】Basing on the traditional interpreting mode—transitive analysis, Halliday put forward the ergative analysis. Different from transitive analysis which focuses on the extension, ergative analysis interprets the meaning of clause from a new perspective: whether theres an outer causation in the process . Through contrast analysis between transitivity and ergativity, this paper provides main concepts of ergativity theories and differences between them. Though Chinese is not considered as a typical “ergative language”, there are lots of ergative constructions in mandarin Chinese which cannot be explained properly by transitive analysis mode. Therefore, basing on certain ergativity theories, this paper mainly focus on analyzing those ergative constructions in mandarin Chinese from the perspective of functional grammar.

【Key words】ergativity; transitivity; ergative analysis; ergative constructions; mandarin Chinese

Chapter 1 Introduction

According to functional linguist Halliday, there are two modes of interpreting peoples experiential world : transitive and ergative mode. Different from transitive analysis, ergative analysis doesnt focus on whether the process extends to some other entity; however, it tries to probe the causation of a process and make clear thats an inner causation or an outer one. Halliday takes the two modes as two totally different ones, but they could complement each other. (Halliday, 2004:282). And Wang huiping thinks that using the two modes together could help us make a more effective understanding of the texture(王惠萍,2006).From the ergative point of view, every clause is consisted of the Medium, the Process, and the optional Agent, which constructs the nucleus of a clause. It pays attention to how the act in a clause happens, being caused by inner reasons or outer force.

Chapter 2 Main Concepts of Ergativity in Functional Grammar

1. Ergative Verbs

In linguistics, ergative verbs are also called non-accusative verbs, which can be either transitive or intransitive, and whose subject when intransitive corresponds to the direct object when transitive.By contrast, with an ergative verb the role of the subject changes, for example:

(1) a.George shattered the mirror .(S + V + O)

b.The mirror shattered .(S + V)

c. 喬治打碎了鏡子。(S + V + O)

d. 鏡子打碎了。(S + V)

2. Medium And Agent

The subject of the above sentence (a) is “George”, while “the mirror” is the subject of sentence (b). So “the mirror” is the object in sentence (a) but is the subject in sentence (b). However, the two sentences almost express the same meaning and use the same verb “shattered”. The difference between the two sentences is not that whether theres an outer participant “George”, but the function of that participant. It is clear that, “George” in sentence (a) is an outer participant and it causes the process.

From the analysis of example sentences above, we could suppose that, in ergative system, there is at least one main participant in a process, through which the process is actualized, and without which there would be no process at all. Halliday calls that element the Medium. The Process and the Medium together form the nucleus of a clause; and the nucleus then determines the range of options that are available to the rest of the clause. Except the medium, there may exist another participant which is described as an outer element, that is the Agent. If the process is a spontaneous one, there will not exist an agent; however, if the process is caused by an outer entity, there must exist an agent.

3. Comparison With the Transitive System

2.3.1 The Transitive Analysis

Transitivity is a semantic system, happenings of people in the real world could be divided into several processes, in which there are relevant “participants” and “circumstances”.

The process of doing or happening is a material process, in which the process is expressed by dynamic verbs, nouns or pronouns are used to express the actor (logical subject) and the goal (logical direct object)；The process of feeling, thinking and perceiving is a kind of mental process. There are two main participants in a mental process: one is the Senser (conscious being that is feeling, thinking or perceiving), the other is the Phenomenon (which is sensed). The analysis of transitive clauses mainly focus on types of the process as well as participants and circumstances involved in the process. For example:

(2) a.He broke the vase. (他打碎了花瓶。)

b.The vase broke. (這花瓶碎了。)

2.3.2 The Ergative analysis

As a name of a kind of grammatical case, ergativity means the form of the “agent” or the outer causation in a clause. Lets still analyze the example clauses above. In the first clause, the act is “broke”, what is broken is “the vase”, and the outer causation of the act is the agent “he”. Meanwhile, “the vase” is also the subject of the clause (b), which is called an ergative subject. This kind of linguistic phenomenon, in which the same element could be placed in the subjective position as well as the objective position, is called “ergative phenomenon”.

Contrast with the transitive analysis, what the ergative analysis investigates is that the causation of the act is an inner one or an outer one. ( 胡壯麟等 2005: 93; 席建國、陳建平、喻旭燕2010: 20-23) In the example above, the act “broke” in example (a) has an obvious outer causation, that is the agent “he”; however, its hard to find the causation in example (b), we do not know the act “broke” is caused by either human factors or other factors. According to ergative analysis, “the vase” in the above two examples has the same function, that is its the medium through which the act “broke” is actualized.

Chapter 3 Ergative Constructions in Mandarin Chinese

1. Ergative Constructions

Briefly speaking, “ergativity” means a kind linguistic phenomenon that the transitive clauses object and the corresponding intransitive clauses subject have the same case. Studies on the ergativity in the linguistic field mainly focus on ergative languages as well as ergative phenomena in non-ergative languages. Though Chinese doesnt belong to those ergative languages, there exist ergative constructions in it. For example,

(3) a.老張蓋了房子(S+V+O)——a房子蓋了(S+V)

b.媽媽養(yǎng)大了孩子(S+V+O)——b孩子養(yǎng)大了(S+V)

c.李明完成了作業(yè)(S+V+O)——c 作業(yè)完成了(S+V)

Example sentences (a)—(c) share the similarity that the subject of each sentence is the patient or object. However, sentences a-c neither have the marker of passive voice nor have corresponding passive constructions. Therefore, sentences like a, b and c are called ergative constructions.

2. Functional Analysis

Halliday (1994/2000) takes the ergative analysis as the complement of transitive analysis. Transitive analysis strictly distinguish the “actor” from the “goal”, focuses on that whether the process extends to other certain entity except the actor itself. While the ergative analysis emphasizes the spontaneity or causation, that is the process is caused by the participant or other certain entity. For example,

(4) transitive clause: a. 他在閱讀。

b. 他在閱讀報紙。

(5) ergative clause: a. 眼睛閉上了。

b. 她閉上了眼睛。

The two transitive clauses in example (7) both have the meaning that “他閱讀”，the process of clause (b) extends to “報紙”, but the process of clause (a) doesnt. The two ergative clauses in example (8)both involve the meaning that “眼睛閉上”，in clause (a) “眼睛” close spontaneously while the process in clause (b) has an outer causation.

Medium is the indispensable element of each ergative constructions, without which the process cannot exist. In addition, there may exist another optional participant which is regarded as the outer causation, that is the agent. If the process happens spontaneously, there is no independent agent. In contrast, if the process is caused by other certain entity, there will exist an agent. Therefor, clauses like “花瓶打碎”，“孩子養(yǎng)大”and “眼睛閉上”all have the same structure : Medium+Process.

Chapter4 Conclusion

According to the analysis above we could conclude that, traditional textual analysis is mainly transitive analysis; however, transitive analysis sometimes cannot completely interpret certain deep meanings. As an useful complement to transitive analysis, ergative analysis have advantages of analyzing deep meanings of certain constructions. Though the two modes complement each other, ergative analysis are more appropriate for some constructions in mandarin Chinese, and we could directly call them ergative constructions. The application of ergative analysis in mandarin Chinese could more properly and completely show the ideational function of the Chinese language.

References：

[1]Dixon.R.1979.Ergativity[J].Language 55:59-138.

[2]Halliday,M.A.K.:An Introduction Functional Grammar[M],revised by C.M.I.M.Matthiessen London:Edward Arnold,2004).

[3]Perlmutter.D.1978.Impersonal passives and unaccusative hypothesis[J].Berkely Inguistics Society 4:157-189.

[4]胡壯麟,朱永生,張德祿.系統(tǒng)功能語言學概論[M].北京:北京大學出版社,2005.