陳建 劉兵 王占坤

摘要：目的 ?對(duì)近20年“體醫(yī)結(jié)合”相關(guān)研究進(jìn)行回顧，找出研究熱點(diǎn)規(guī)律，預(yù)測(cè)研究發(fā)展趨勢(shì)。方法 ?運(yùn)用Cite Space分析工具，以1999～2019年CNKI數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)收錄的321篇“體醫(yī)結(jié)合”研究相關(guān)的文獻(xiàn)為樣本，采用文獻(xiàn)計(jì)量學(xué)和科學(xué)知識(shí)圖譜，對(duì)“體醫(yī)結(jié)合”研究的作者與機(jī)構(gòu)分布、研究熱點(diǎn)內(nèi)容、年度文獻(xiàn)分布及發(fā)展脈絡(luò)進(jìn)行分析。結(jié)果 ?發(fā)文量≥3的作者13人，排前3的是郭建軍、付強(qiáng)、傅蘭英;以付強(qiáng)、傅蘭英為核心的團(tuán)隊(duì)等共4個(gè)團(tuán)隊(duì)在“體醫(yī)結(jié)合”研究中合作較為穩(wěn)定;發(fā)文量≥3的機(jī)構(gòu)13個(gè)，1999～2019 年開展“體醫(yī)結(jié)合”的研究發(fā)文量最多的機(jī)構(gòu)是新鄉(xiāng)醫(yī)學(xué)院體育部，累計(jì)發(fā)文量 8 篇;所統(tǒng)計(jì)的321篇期刊文獻(xiàn)中獲取到69個(gè)關(guān)鍵詞，選取頻次≥6的關(guān)鍵詞12個(gè)，“體醫(yī)結(jié)合”關(guān)鍵詞出現(xiàn)頻次達(dá)258次，其出現(xiàn)頻率遠(yuǎn)高于其他，是該研究領(lǐng)域的研究主題;關(guān)鍵詞出現(xiàn)的頻次及中心度的正相關(guān)性略有偏差，中心度位于前3位的是“體醫(yī)結(jié)合”、健康中國(guó)、醫(yī)學(xué)院校;“體醫(yī)結(jié)合”研究呈現(xiàn)為萌芽期（1999～2005年）、平穩(wěn)過渡期（2006～2015 年）、快速發(fā)展期（2016～2019 年）3個(gè)時(shí)期。結(jié)論 ?“體醫(yī)結(jié)合”總體研究水平不高，研究成果較為分散，跨學(xué)科、跨領(lǐng)域的作者和機(jī)構(gòu)的智庫(kù)尚未形成;參與研究人員層次不高，相互間合作網(wǎng)絡(luò)密度較低，深層次合作缺乏，明確的核心研究人員和核心團(tuán)隊(duì)缺乏;真正進(jìn)入研究發(fā)展快速時(shí)間較短，體育、醫(yī)學(xué)權(quán)威研究機(jī)構(gòu)及政府組成部門出現(xiàn)一邊熱一邊冷現(xiàn)象。應(yīng)鼓勵(lì)高水平研究人員參與研究;加強(qiáng)研究者之間的緊密合作;借鑒國(guó)外經(jīng)驗(yàn)，加強(qiáng)頂層設(shè)計(jì)。

關(guān)鍵詞：Cite Space;體醫(yī)結(jié)合;熱點(diǎn);發(fā)展趨勢(shì)

中圖分類號(hào)：G353.1;R87 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼：B ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.17.001

文章編號(hào)：1006-1959（2020）17-0001-06

Abstract：Objective ?To review the related research on "Integration of Sports and Medicine" in the past 20 years， to find out the law of research hotspots and to predict the development trend of research.Methods ?Using the Cite Space analysis tool， 321 articles related to the study of "Integration of Sports and Medicine" included in the CNKI database from 1999 to 2019 were used as samples， and bibliometrics and scientific knowledge graphs were used to identify the authors and institutions of the study of "Integration of Sports and Medicine". Analyze the distribution， research hotspot content， annual document distribution and development context.Results ?There were 13 authors with a number of articles ≥3， and the top 3 are Guo Jianjun， Fu Qiang， and Fu Lanying; a total of 4 teams with Fu Qiang and Fu Lanying as the core team were more stable in cooperation in the "Integration of Sports and Medicine" research; the number of articles ≥there were 13 institutions in 3， 1999～2019， the institution that carried out the research on "Integration of Sports and Medicine" and published the most was the Sports Department of Xinxiang Medical College， with a total of 8 articles; 69 keywords were obtained from the statistics of 321 journal articles select 12 keywords with frequency ≥6. The keyword "Integration of Sports and Medicine" appeared frequently 258 times， which was much higher than others. It was a research topic in this research field; the frequency and centrality of keywords were positive，there was a slight deviation in the correlation. The top 3 centers were "Integration of Sports and Medicine"， Healthy China， and Medical Colleges; the research of "Integration of Sports and Medicine" was in its infancy （1999～2005） and a smooth transition period （2006～ 2015） and the rapid development period （2016～2019）.Conclusion ?The overall research level of "Integration of Sports and Medicine" was not high， the research results were relatively scattered， and the think tanks of authors and institutions across disciplines and fields had not yet formed; the level of participating researchers was not high， the density of mutual cooperation networks was low， and deep-level cooperation was lacking，there was a lack of clear core researchers and core teams; it took a short time to really enter the research and development， and the sports and medical authoritative research institutions and government departments appear to be hot while cold. High-level researchers should be encouraged to participate in research; strengthen close cooperation among researchers; learn from foreign experience and strengthen top-level design.