国产日韩欧美一区二区三区三州_亚洲少妇熟女av_久久久久亚洲av国产精品_波多野结衣网站一区二区_亚洲欧美色片在线91_国产亚洲精品精品国产优播av_日本一区二区三区波多野结衣 _久久国产av不卡

?

Comment on: Long-term hemodialysis improved and stabilized diabetic macular edema: two case reports

2022-03-04 12:08:26YusukeKamedaYutaSuzukiMegumiSugaiKarinIshinabeNichikaFukuoka
International Journal of Ophthalmology 2022年11期

Yusuke Kameda, Yuta Suzuki, Megumi Sugai, Karin Ishinabe, Nichika Fukuoka

Yotsuya-sanchome Ekimae Eye Clinic, Tokyo 160-0004, Japan

Dear Editor,

With great excitement, we read the article titled “Longterm hemodialysis improved and stabilized diabetic macular edema: two case reports” by Fan and Yuan[1]; a case series study which provided interesting novel insights into the beneficial effect of hemodialysis (HD) on diabetic macular edema (DME). Although we congratulate the authors for a valuable case presentation, we feel that their study did not mention the mechanism by which it suppresses the pathogenesis of DME. Therefore, we would like to provide supplementary comments through many years of our research regarding the association between diabetic eye disease and HD.

In general, patients with end-stage diabetic kidney disease who crucially need HD are likely to have fluid overload[2].Under the condition of fluid overload, an imbalance between the colloid osmotic and the hydrostatic pressures favors fluid movement from the vascular to the extravascular compartment, as stated in Starling’s principle[3]. Thus, patients with fluid overload and microvasculopathy due to the longterm effects of diabetes might readily suffer from exacerbation of DME, possibly resulting from the increased retinal vascular permeability[4]. However, the initiation of HD, such as in the study by Fan and Yuan[1], ameliorated the conditions associated with fluid overload, resulting in the resolution of DME. Takamuraet al’s[5]multicenter study including 132 eyes during the 12-month period after HD initiation reported that the anatomical and functional outcomes of DME significantly improved immediately after initiation and were maintained until the end of the study period. Hence, HD as a treatment for fluid retension is an important therapeutic option for patients with DME and fluid overload due to end-stage diabetic kidney disease. Incidentally, this mechanism can be applied to other medical treatments. Kamedaet al[4]and Ciardella[6]reported cases, with fluid overload and extensive DME, who experienced marked improvement in DME after only strict medical treatment including administration of furosemide.

In contrast, many ophthalmologists are concerned that starting HD in patients with advanced stage of diabetic retinopathy could have a higher risk of subsequent vitreous hemorrhage(VH), as HD requires systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin. However, somewhat surprisingly, HD might suppress the pathogenesis of VH, as well as DME. In our previous study, including 145 eyes during the 12-month period before and after HD initiation, the incidence of VH was significantly lower in the HD stage than in the pre-HD stage[7].Moreover, our recent study reported that HD has a benefical impact on vitrectomy outcomes; the 6-month incidence of VH and neovascular glaucoma following vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy was significantly lower in the HD group than in the stages 3-5 chronic kidney disease group(in patients not on HD)[8]. Based on these reports, we believe that HD may play a significant role as a “game-changer” in various situation of diabetic eye disease, and the cases of Fan and Yuan’s[1]study confirmed our hypothesis.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Authors’ contributions:Kameda Y researched the data,wrote the manuscript, and contributed to the discussion.Suzuki Y, Sugai M, Ishinabe K and Fukuoka N contributed to the discussion, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. As the corresponding author and guarantor of this manuscript,Kameda Y takes full responsibility for the work as a whole,including the study design, access to the data, and the decision to submit and publish the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agree to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest: Kameda Y,None;Suzuki Y,None;Sugai M,None;Ishinabe K,None;Fukuoka N,None.

伊金霍洛旗| 大理市| 长乐市| 泸西县| 清河县| 合作市| 木兰县| 林口县| 巫山县| 含山县| 美姑县| 长春市| 天等县| 逊克县| 武威市| 滨海县| 邳州市| 长春市| 磴口县| 仪征市| 泰来县| 温州市| 社会| 福泉市| 南宁市| 霞浦县| 乐清市| 大埔区| 阳信县| 柳林县| 汉中市| 灵川县| 宽甸| 瑞昌市| 綦江县| 石阡县| 香港 | 仁寿县| 奉贤区| 吉安市| 泰顺县|